A New Method for Model-Based Health Economic Evaluation Utilizing and Extending Moment-Generating Functions
Open accessAbstract
Background. Health economic evaluations frequently include projections for lifetime costs and health effects using modeling frameworks such as Markov modeling or discrete event simulation (DES). Markov models typically cannot represent events whose risk is determined by the length of time spent in state (sojourn time) without the use of tunnel states. DES is very flexible but introduces Monte Carlo variation, which can significantly limit the complexity of model analyses. Methods. We present a new methodological framework for health economic modeling that is based on, and extends, the concept of moment-generating functions (MGFs) for time-to-event random variables. When future costs and health effects are discounted, MGFs can be used to very efficiently calculate the total discounted life-years spent in a series of health states. Competing risks are incorporated into the method. This method can also be used to calculate discounted costs and health effects when these payoffs are constant per unit time, one-off, or exponential with regard to time. MGFs are extended to additionally support costs and health effects which are polynomial with regard to time (as in a commonly used model of population norms for EQ-5D utility). Worked Example. A worked example is used to demonstrate the application of the new method in practice and to compare it with Markov modeling and DES. Results are compared in terms of convergence and accuracy, and computation times are compared. R code and an Excel workbook are provided. Conclusions. The MGF method can be applied to health economic evaluations in the place of Markov modeling or DES and has certain advantages over both.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Since all members of the cohort in the simulation age together, age-specific background mortality can be implemented by changing the transition to death as the simulation progresses.
“Since all members of the cohort in the simulation age together, we can implement this dependency by changing the transition to death as the simulation progresses.”
From A Tutorial on Time-Dependent Cohort State-Transition Models in R Using a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Example (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
State-Transition Modeling: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force–3
Siebert, U., Alagoz, O., Bayoumi, A. M., Jahn, B., Owens, D. K., Cohen, D. J., & Kuntz, K. M. (2012) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x12455463 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- Caro JJ, Briggs AH, Siebert U, Kuntz KM, ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force. Modeling good research practices--overview: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(5):667-77. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12454577 · DOI · Paper page
- Cooper N, Sutton A, Ades A, Paisley S, Jones D. Use of evidence in economic decision models: Practical issues and methodological challenges. Health Econ. 2007;16(12):1277-86. doi: 10.1002/hec.1297 · DOI
- Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien B, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
- Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB. Recommendations of the panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. JAMA. 1996;276(15):1253-8.
- Woods B, Sideris E, Palmer S, Latimer N, Soares M. NICE DSU Technical Support Document 19. Partitioned survival analysis for decision modelling in health care: a critical review 2017. Available from: http://www.nicedsu.org.uk/.
- Briggs AH. Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness models. PharmacoEconomics. 2000;17(5):479-500.
- Strong M, Oakley JE, Brennan A. Estimating multiparameter partial expected value of perfect information from a probabilistic sensitivity analysis sample: a nonparametric regression approach. Med Decis Making. 2014;34(3):311-26. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13505910 · DOI
- Ren Y. The methodology of flowgraph models: a thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. London: London School of Economics and Political Science; 2011.
- Ara R, Brazier JE. Populating an economic model with health state utility values: moving toward better practice. Value Health. 2010;13(5):509-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1524- 4733.2010.00700.x · DOI
- Larson MG, Dinse GE. A Mixture Model for the Regression Analysis of Competing Risks Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics). 1985;34(3):201-11. doi: 10.2307/2347464 · DOI
- Karnon J, Stahl J, Brennan A, Caro JJ, Mar J, Moller J. Modeling using discrete event simulation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force- 4. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(5):701-11. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12455462 · DOI
- Fine JP, Gray RJ. A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1999;94(446):496-509. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144 · DOI · Paper page
- Nicolaie MA, van Houwelingen HC, Putter H. Vertical modeling: A pattern mixture approach for competing risks modeling. Statistics in Medicine. 2010;29(11):1190-205. doi: 10.1002/sim.3844 · DOI
- Roberts M, Russell LB, Paltiel AD, Chambers M, McEwan P, Krahn M, et al. Conceptualizing a model: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-2. Med Decis Making. 2012;32(5):678-89. doi: 10.1177/0272989X12454941 · DOI
- Filipović-Pierucci A, Zarca K, Durand-Zaleski I. Markov Models for Health Economic Evaluation: The R Package heemod. ArXiv e-prints. 2017;1702.03252.
- Snowsill T. A new method for model-based health economic evaluation utilising and extending moment-generating functions: Example model. Open Research Exeter. 2019. doi: 10.24378/exe.643 · DOI
- Barendregt JJ. The half-cycle correction: banish rather than explain it. Med Decis Making. 2009;29(4):500-2. doi: 10.1177/0272989X09340585 · DOI
- Krijkamp EM, Alarid-Escudero F, Enns EA, Jalal HJ, Hunink MGM, Pechlivanoglou P. Microsimulation Modeling for Health Decision Sciences Using R: A Tutorial. Med Decis Making. 2018;38(3):400-22. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18754513 · DOI
- Royston P, Parmar MK. Flexible parametric proportional-hazards and proportional-odds models for censored survival data, with application to prognostic modelling and estimation of treatment effects. Stat Med. 2002;21(15):2175-97. doi: 10.1002/sim.1203 · DOI
- van Rosmalen J, Toy M, O'Mahony JF. A Mathematical Approach for Evaluating Markov Models in Continuous Time without Discrete-Event Simulation. Medical Decision Making. 2013;33(6):767-79. doi: 10.1177/0272989x13487947 · DOI · Paper page
- Davis P, Rabinowizt P. Methods of numerical integration. New York: Academic Press; 1975.
- DeVore R, Scott L. Error-bounds for Gaussian quadrature and weighted-L1 polynomial approximation. SIAM J Numer Anal. 1984;21(2):400-12.
- Stoer J, Bulirsch R. Introduction to numerical analysis. 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alarid-Escudero, F., Krijkamp, E., Enns, E. A., Yang, A., Hunink, M. G. M., Pechlivanoglou, P., & Jalal, H. (2023) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x221121747 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“Equation (1) is iteratively evaluated until t = n T .”
MethodInfluential
- Authors
- Snowsill, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Exeter (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Snowsill, Tristan
- ORCID
- Snowsill, Tristan
- Venue
- Medical Decision Making
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 523-539
- ISSN
- 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-681X
- OpenAlex
- W2963477364
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Medical Decision Making (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- moment generating function, health economic evaluation, Markov model, discrete event simulation, sojourn time, competing risks, discounted cost, EQ-5D utility
- MeSH terms
- Economics, Medical, Humans, Markov Chains, Models, Economic, Quality-Adjusted Life Years
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review