The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes study: Initial Catalog of Health-state Quality Factors
Abstract
The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study (BDHOS) is an ongoing longitudinal cohort study of health status and health-related quality of life for a random sample of adults (age range at interview was 45 to 89 years; mean = 64.1, SD = 10.8) in a community population. In a face-to-face interview lasting approximately an hour, each participant responds to several batteries of questions. Included are a history of chronic medical conditions, current medi cations, and past surgeries; the SF-36 (a general health-status questionnaire); the Quality of Well-being index; self-rated health status on a five-point scale from "excellent" to "poor"; and evaluation of current health using the method of time tradeoffs. The authors present results from 1,356 interviews on these four principal measures, reporting mean scores by sex, by age, and for persons reporting being affected by various medical conditions. They believe data from the BDHOS will provide researchers and policy makers a reference col lection of vital statistics for health-related quality of life. Additionally, the data provide a way to compare results from studies that utilize different indices from among the four principal measures of the BDHOS. Key words: health status; quality of life (health-related); population study; cohort study. (Med Decis Making 1993;13:89-102)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
The MOS Short-form General Health Survey: Reliability and Validity in a Patient Population
Stewart, A. L., Hays, R. D., & Ware, J. E. (1988) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007 · Cited by 3,339
Cited by
Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review
Fortin, M., Lapointe, L., Hudon, C., Vanasse, A., Ntetu, A. L., & Maltais, D. (2004) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-2-51 · Cited by 963
Willingness to Pay for a Quality-adjusted Life Year: In Search of a Standard
Hirth, R. A., Chernew, M. E., Miller, E., Fendrick, A. M., & Weissert, W. G. (2000) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x0002000310 · Cited by 850
Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D
Burström, K., Johannesson, M., & Diderichsen, F. (2001) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1023/a:1013171831202 · Cited by 664
Braithwaite, R. S., Meltzer, D. O., King, J. T., Leslie, D., & Roberts, M. S. (2008) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31815c31a7 · Cited by 579
A National Catalog of Preference-Based Scores for Chronic Conditions in the United States
Sullivan, P. W., Lawrence, W. F., & Ghushchyan, V. (2005) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000172050.67085.4f · Cited by 388
Metadata
- Authors
- Fryback, D. G., Dasbach, E. J., Klein, R., Klein, B. E. K., Dorn, N., Peterson, K., & Martin, P. A.
- Venue
- Medical Decision Making
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-06
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-102
- ISSN
- 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-681X
- OpenAlex
- W2000182266
- Cited by
- 733
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes study: Initial Catalog of Health-state Quality Factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0272989x9301300202
- The paper
- Fryback, D. G., Dasbach, E. J., Klein, R., Klein, B. E. K., Dorn, N., Peterson, K., & Martin, P. A. (1993). The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes study: Initial Catalog of Health-state Quality Factors. Medical Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9301300202
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
