Cited by 963Chronic Disease Management StrategiesPrimary Care and Health OutcomesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review

Open access
Fortin, Martin, Lapointe, Lise, Hudon, Catherine, Vanasse, Alain, Ntetu, Antoine L, Maltais, Danielle·2004·Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Abstract

Background: Many patients with several concurrent medical conditions (multimorbidity) are seen in the primary care setting. A thorough understanding of outcomes associated with multimorbidity would benefit primary care workers of all disciplines. The purpose of this systematic review was to clarify the relationship between the presence of multimorbidity and the quality of life (QOL) or health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients seen, or likely to be seen, in the primary care setting. Methods: Medline and Embase electronic databases were screened using the following search terms for the reference period 1990 to 2003: multimorbidity, comorbidity, chronic disease, and their spelling variations, along with quality of life and health-related quality of life. Only descriptive studies relevant to primary care were selected. Results: Of 753 articles screened, 108 were critically assessed for compliance with study inclusion and exclusion criteria. Thirty of these studies were ultimately selected for this review, including 7 in which the relationship between multimorbidity or comorbidity and QOL or HRQOL was the main outcome measure. Major limitations of these studies include the lack of a uniform definition for multimorbidity or comorbidity and the absence of assessment of disease severity. The use of self-reported diagnoses may also be a weakness. The frequent exclusion of psychiatric diagnoses and presence of potential confounding variables are other limitations. Nonetheless, we did find an inverse relationship between the number of medical conditions and QOL related to physical domains. For social and psychological dimensions of QOL, some studies reveal a similar inverse relationship in patients with 4 or more diagnoses. Conclusions: Our findings confirm the existence of an inverse relationship between multimorbidity or comorbidy and QOL. However, additional studies are needed to clarify this relationship, including the various dimensions of QOL affected. Those studies must employ a clear definition of multimorbidity or comorbidity and valid ways to measure these concepts in a primary care setting. Pursuit of this research will help to better understand the impact of chronic diseases on patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1477-7525-2-51

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Results are similar to previous meta-analyses and reviews, pointing towards conclusive evidence that additional factors (physical or psychological) decrease QoL and functionality in asthma.

    “Results are similar to previous meta-analyses and reviews,8,72 pointing towards conclusive evidence that additional factors (physical or psychological) decrease QoL and functionality in asthma.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fortin, M., Lapointe, L., Hudon, C., Vanasse, A., Ntetu, A. L., & Maltais, D.
Affiliations
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (CA)
Corresponding author
Fortin, Martin
Venue
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published
2004-09-20
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
51-51
ISSN
1477-7525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117059102
Cited by
963
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 68 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 36
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Constellation (Université du Québec à Chicoutimi) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • Université de Sherbrooke
  • Pfizer Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
multimorbidity, comorbidities, health-related quality of life, quality of life, primary care, chronic disease, physical health, psychosocial well-being, number of diagnoses
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Health Services Research, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Primary Health Care, Quality of Life, Comorbidity, Databases, Bibliographic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review