The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale
Abstract
The study objective was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a decisional conflict scale (DCS) that elicits: 1) health-care consumers' uncertainty in making a health-related decision; 2) the factors contributing to the uncertainty; and 3) health-care consumers' perceived ef fective decision making. The DCS was developed in response to the lack of instruments available to evaluate health-care-consumer decision aids and to tailor decision-supporting interventions to particular consumer needs. The scale was evaluated with 909 individuals deciding about influenza immunization or breast cancer screening. A subsample of respon dents was retested two weeks later. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.81. Internal consistency coefficients ranged from 0.78 to 0.92. The DCS discriminated significantly (p < 0.0002) between those who had strong intentions either to accept or to decline invitations to receive influenza vaccine or breast cancer screening and those whose intentions were uncertain. The scale also discriminated significantly (p < 0.0002) between those who ac cepted or rejected immunization and those who delayed their decisions to be immunized. There was a weak inverse correlation (r = - 0.16, p < 0.05) between the DCS and knowledge test scores. The psychometric properties of the scale are acceptable. It is feasible and easy to administer. Evaluations of responsiveness to change and validation with more difficult decisions are warranted. Key words: measurement; decision making; immunization; breast cancer screening. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:25-30)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Evans JR, 1987, Toward a Shared Direction for Health in Ontario: Report of the Ontario Heath Review Panel
- O'Connor A., 1994, Med Decis Making., 14, 438
- 10.1016/S0097-5990(16)30531-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7326/0003-4819-117-1-53 · DOI · Paper page
- Rothert ML, Women's Judgements of Estrogen Replacement Therapy
- Neufeld K., 1993, Oncol Nurs Forum., 20, 631
- 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90220-J · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90220-j
- O'Connor AM, 1993, Decisional conflict
- O'Connor AM, 1990, Decisional conflict
- BPH Shared Decision Making Project, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound
- North American Nursing Diagnosis Association., 10th Conference on Classification of Nursing Diagnoses
- Sjoberg L., 1983, To smoke or not to smoke: conflict or lack of differentiation
- Janis IL, 1977, Decision Making
- 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90112-3 · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(89)90112-3
- 10.1001/archinte.1990.00040031717022 · DOI
- 10.1097/00006199-198301000-00006 · DOI
- 10.1002/nur.4770010304 · DOI
- 10.1002/nur.4770040405 · DOI
- Watkins LO, 1986, Heart Lung., 15, 382
- O'Connor AM, 1992, Med Decis Making., 12, 335
- Osoba D., 1992, R Coll Physicians Surgeons Ann., 25, 234
Cited by
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C. L., Eden, K. B., Holmes-Rovner, M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Lyddiatt, A., Thomson, R., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub5 · Cited by 6,685
Gravel, K., Légaré, F., & Graham, I. D. (2006) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-1-16 · Cited by 755
When the treatment goal is not cure: are cancer patients equipped to make informed decisions?
Gattellari, M., Voigt, K. J., Butow, P. N., & Tattersall, M. H. N. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2002.20.2.503 · Cited by 344
Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: The case for a broader conceptual framework
Entwistle, V. A., & Watt, I. S. (2006) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.002 · Cited by 314
Validation of a Preparation for Decision Making scale
Bennett, C., Graham, I. D., Kristjansson, E., Kearing, S. A., Clay, K. F., & O’Connor, A. M. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.05.012 · Cited by 305
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Connor, A. M.
- Venue
- Medical Decision Making
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-30
- ISSN
- 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-681X
- OpenAlex
- W2159846010
- Cited by
- 2,452
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0272989x9501500105
- The paper
- O'Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale. Medical Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9501500105
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.