Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 2,452

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale

O'Connor, Annette M.·1995·Medical Decision Making

Abstract

The study objective was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a decisional conflict scale (DCS) that elicits: 1) health-care consumers' uncertainty in making a health-related decision; 2) the factors contributing to the uncertainty; and 3) health-care consumers' perceived ef fective decision making. The DCS was developed in response to the lack of instruments available to evaluate health-care-consumer decision aids and to tailor decision-supporting interventions to particular consumer needs. The scale was evaluated with 909 individuals deciding about influenza immunization or breast cancer screening. A subsample of respon dents was retested two weeks later. The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.81. Internal consistency coefficients ranged from 0.78 to 0.92. The DCS discriminated significantly (p < 0.0002) between those who had strong intentions either to accept or to decline invitations to receive influenza vaccine or breast cancer screening and those whose intentions were uncertain. The scale also discriminated significantly (p < 0.0002) between those who ac cepted or rejected immunization and those who delayed their decisions to be immunized. There was a weak inverse correlation (r = - 0.16, p < 0.05) between the DCS and knowledge test scores. The psychometric properties of the scale are acceptable. It is feasible and easy to administer. Evaluations of responsiveness to change and validation with more difficult decisions are warranted. Key words: measurement; decision making; immunization; breast cancer screening. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:25-30)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0272989x9501500105

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Evans JR, 1987, Toward a Shared Direction for Health in Ontario: Report of the Ontario Heath Review Panel
  2. O'Connor A., 1994, Med Decis Making., 14, 438
  3. 10.1016/S0097-5990(16)30531-0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.7326/0003-4819-117-1-53 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Rothert ML, Women's Judgements of Estrogen Replacement Therapy
  6. Neufeld K., 1993, Oncol Nurs Forum., 20, 631
  7. 10.1016/0895-4356(90)90220-J · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90220-j
  8. O'Connor AM, 1993, Decisional conflict
  9. O'Connor AM, 1990, Decisional conflict
  10. BPH Shared Decision Making Project, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound
  11. North American Nursing Diagnosis Association., 10th Conference on Classification of Nursing Diagnoses
  12. Sjoberg L., 1983, To smoke or not to smoke: conflict or lack of differentiation
  13. Janis IL, 1977, Decision Making
  14. 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90112-3 · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(89)90112-3
  15. 10.1001/archinte.1990.00040031717022 · DOI
  16. 10.1097/00006199-198301000-00006 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/nur.4770010304 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/nur.4770040405 · DOI
  19. Watkins LO, 1986, Heart Lung., 15, 382
  20. O'Connor AM, 1992, Med Decis Making., 12, 335
  21. Osoba D., 1992, R Coll Physicians Surgeons Ann., 25, 234

Cited by

See all 2,452

Metadata

Authors
O'Connor, A. M.
Venue
Medical Decision Making
Published
1995-02
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
25-30
ISSN
  • 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-681X
OpenAlex
W2159846010
Cited by
2,452
References
0
FWCI
20.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0272989x9501500105
The paper
O'Connor, A. M. (1995). Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale. Medical Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9501500105

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.