The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patient Participation in Deciding Breast Cancer Treatment and Subsequent Quality of Life
Abstract
This investigation of patients with early breast cancer examined relationships among patient involvement in deciding treatment (i.e., whether to undergo breast removal or breast conservation), perceptions of control over treatment decisions, and subsequent health-related quality of life. It was predicted 1) that patients who more actively participated in consultations to decide treatment would perceive more decision control than would more passive patients and 2) that patients who perceived greater decision control would report better health-related quality of life following treatment than would patients perceiving less decision control. Sixty patients with stage I or II breast cancer allowed their consultations with surgeons to be audiorecorded. Following these visits, patients reported on their involvement in the consultation, optimism for the future, knowledge about treatment, and two aspects of perceived decision control, the perception of having a choice for treatment and the extent to which the doctor or patient was responsible for the decision. Six and 12 months postoperatively, 51 patients (85%) returned a follow-up survey assessing perceived decision control and health-related quality of life. The first prediction received some support. The patients who had more actively participated in their consultations, particularly in terms of offering opinions, assumed more responsibility for treatment decisions during the year following surgery than did less expressive patient…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Research suggests that patient participation is linked to positive patient outcomes such as improved quality of life, reduced anxiety and depression, greater satisfaction, better sharing of information, and better treatment adherence (6)(7)(8)(9).”
From High levels of socioeconomic deprivation do not inhibit patients’ communication of concerns in head and neck cancer review clinics (2018) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Nonetheless, building rapport is an important aspect of clinical communication with a number of benefits for patients (5,(7)(8)(9), and low SES patients may be placed at a disadvantage if less time is spent building rapport.”
From High levels of socioeconomic deprivation do not inhibit patients’ communication of concerns in head and neck cancer review clinics (2018) · cites this paper as [8]
Citations
Cites
Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.
Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.219 · Cited by 6,690
The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure
Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., Silberman, M., Yellen, S. B., Winicour, P., & Brannon, J. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1993.11.3.570 · Cited by 6,020
Communicative styles and adaptations in physician–parent consultations
Street, R. L. (1992) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90289-3 · Cited by 196
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 41
- Steptoe A, 1989, Stress, Personal Control and Health
- 10.1007/BF02686633 · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-6133.5.5.481 · DOI
- 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90314-G · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1984.tb01955.x · DOI
- 10.1037/0278-6133.10.6.399 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005650-197903000-00004 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02599549 · DOI
- 10.1002/1097-0142(19951201)76:11<2275::AID-CNCR2820761115>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
- Lerman C, 1990, J Gen Intern Med., 5, 29, 10.1007/BF02602306 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327027hc0801_2 · DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.16.5.714 · DOI
- 10.2337/diacare.14.10.881 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02595921 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0278-6133.6.1.29 · DOI
- 10.1097/00002820-199004000-00003 · DOI
- 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.9.1192 · DOI
- Hughes KK., 1993, Oncol Nurs Forum, 20, 623
- Hogbin B, 1989, Br J Hosp Med., 41, 330
- 10.1016/S0002-9610(05)81172-9 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0033291700024272 · DOI
- 10.1300/J077v09n04_05 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.293.6558.1331 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.301.6752.575 · DOI
- 10.1016/0277-9536(88)90355-3 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.489 · DOI
- 10.2307/2137046 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005650-199211000-00002 · DOI
- Roter DL, 1993, Doctors talking to patients/patients talking to doctors
- 10.7326/0003-4819-92-6-832 · DOI
- Hughes KK., 1993, Cancer Nurs., 16, 222
- 10.2307/2137014 · DOI
- 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90178-F · DOI
- 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90288-N · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90032-4 · DOI
- 10.7326/0003-4819-102-4-520 · DOI
- 10.2105/AJPH.72.2.141 · DOI
- 10.1177/0272989X9601600114 · DOI
- Kaplan SH, 1995, Med Care, 33, 1176, 10.1097/00005650-199512000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90336-0 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12117 · Cited by 7,219
How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes
Street, R. L., Makoul, G. T., Arora, N. K., & Epstein, R. M. (2009) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015 · Cited by 2,702
“For example, various features of patient-centered communication – physicians’ clear explanations, physician compassion, active patient participation, and patient involvement in decision-making – have correlated with lower blood pressure [9], less patient anxiety [10], less organ damage among patients with systemic lup…”
BackgroundSelf-citationKelley, J. M., Kraft‐Todd, G., Schapira, L., Kossowsky, J., & Riess, H. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094207 · Cited by 968
“In fact, most empirical studies examining the effect of the patient-clinician relationship on medical outcomes have been observational in nature [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11] and therefore cannot assess causality.”
BackgroundInteracting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior
Arora, N. K. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00449-5 · Cited by 661
“Street and Voigt (1997) reported women with early stage breast cancer ðn ¼ 51Þ who, during the year following surgery, believed they were given more decisional control experienced higher levels of QOL.”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Street, R. L., & Voigt, B.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- ORCID
- Street, Richard L.
- Venue
- Medical Decision Making
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-07
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 298-306
- ISSN
- 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-681X
- OpenAlex
- W1986448046
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 16.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Decision Making (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
- Keywords
- patient participation, shared decision-making, breast cancer, early breast cancer, health-related quality of life, breast-conserving therapy, mastectomy, physician-patient consultation, treatment selection
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Decision Support Techniques, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Internal-External Control, Middle Aged, Patient Care Team, Patient Participation, Quality of Life, Mastectomy, Segmental, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review