High levels of socioeconomic deprivation do not inhibit patients’ communication of concerns in head and neck cancer review clinics
Open accessAbstract
To examine associations between socioeconomic status and the extent to which patients with cancer of the head and neck expressed concerns to surgeons during routine follow-up clinics, we analysed audio recordings of 110 consultations with one consultant. We used the Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VRCoDES) to measure communication between the doctor and the patient, and grouped the English indices of multiple deprivation (IMD) 2015 scores into deciles to compare the VRCoDES with socioeconomic status. There were no significant correlations between IMD decile and the number and type of cues and concerns, or the type of response by the consultant, but there was a positive correlation between IMD decile and duration of appointment (r=0.288, p<0.01). When the duration of appointment was controlled for, there was a negative correlation between IMD decile and number of cues and concerns (r=-0.221, p<0.05). These findings question the assumption that socioeconomic status is associated with a patient's willingness to express concerns. Shorter consultations suggest that less time is spent responding to their concerns or building a rapport. Clinicians might find it advantageous to adopt strategies that will improve their understanding of these patients and help them to communicate more effectively.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In 110 audiorecorded head and neck cancer review consultations, area-level socioeconomic deprivation (IMD decile) was not significantly correlated with patients’ cues/concerns or clinician responses. Appointment length was positively correlated with IMD decile, and after controlling for appointment length, higher IMD decile was associated with fewer cues/concerns.
Key findings
- No significant correlations were found between IMD decile and number of cues and concerns, elicitation of cues/concerns, clinician responses, type of cues, or proportion of concerns to cues (e.g., number of cues and concerns: r = -.004, p = .97; patient-elicited cues/concerns: r = .072, p = .456; consultant-elicited cues/concerns: r = -.059, p = .543).
- IMD decile was positively correlated with appointment length, r = .288, p < .01.
- When appointment length was controlled with Pearson’s partial correlation, IMD decile was negatively correlated with number of cues and concerns, r = -.221, p < .05.
- Time to first cue or concern showed a positive correlation with IMD decile that approached significance, r = .218, p = .077.
Methods
- The study analysed 110 audiorecorded head and neck oncology review consultations with a single consultant head and neck surgeon.
- Patient SES was measured using English Indices of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) 2015 scores, split into deciles and accessed via patient postcodes.
- Communication was coded using the Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VRCoDES); associations were examined with Pearson’s correlation and Pearson’s partial correlation controlling for appointment length.
Limitations
- The paper states that only 110 audiotapes were analysed, so the sample size may have been too small to detect significant differences.
- The paper states that only one consultant participated, limiting generalisability, though this controlled for variation between consultants.
- The paper states that IMD is area-level and based on postcodes, so individuals in deprived areas may still be high SES by education or occupation; the text also notes that an ordinal regression suggested by a reviewer was not done because it would require a larger sample and be underpowered.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
5 of 16 cited sources checked · 4 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
There was a positive correlation between IMD decile and appointment length, r = .288, p < .01.
“There was a positive correlation between IMD decile and appointment length, r = .288,p <.01.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“There was however a significant positive correlation between IMD decile and length of appointment, r = .288,p < .01.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
When appointment length was controlled for, there was a negative correlation between IMD decile and number of cues and concerns, r = -.221, p < .05.
“When appointment length was controlled for, there was a negative correlation between IMD decile and number of cues and concerns, r = -.221,p < .05.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“In addition, when length of appointment was controlled using a Pearson's partial correlation, a significant and negative association between number of cues and concerns and IMD decile was found, r = -.221,p < .05.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
The clinician did not favour higher or lower SES groups in eliciting concerns.
“although we note that the clinician did not favour higher or lower SES groups in eliciting concerns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
It may be the patient not the doctor who curtails rapport building by moving towards problem solving.
“Such an interpretation fits with previous research finding that healthcare professionals spend more time building rapport with high SES patients (11), and adds the insight that it may be the patient not the doctor who curtails rapport building by moving towards problem solving.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] source
- Interpretationown data
The findings question the assumption that SES is associated with patients' willingness to express their concerns during consultations.
“These findings question the assumption that SES is associated with patients' willingness to express their concerns during consultations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Area-level deprivation measured by IMD is a valid proxy for patient socioeconomic status.
- Interpretationown data
The influence of SES on doctor-patient communication in this particular patient group is limited.
“This suggests that perhaps the influence of SES on doctor-patient communication in this particular patient group is limited.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Area-level deprivation measured by IMD is a valid proxy for patient socioeconomic status.
- Interpretationreasoning
Previously reported SES effects of education and income on communication may pertain to the specific influence of verbal or other academic skills rather than SES, per se.
“Previously reported SES effects of education and income on communication may pertain to the specific influence of verbal or other academic skills rather than SES, per se.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Area-level deprivation measured by IMD is a valid proxy for patient socioeconomic status.
- Interpretationreasoning
Lower SES patients are keen to voice their concerns.
“it may be advantageous for clinicians to adopt active strategies that allow them to build rapport with lower SES patients who are keen to voice their concerns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
Only one consultant participated, compromising the ability to generalise these findings.
“Secondly, only one consultant participated in the present study, compromising our ability to generalise these findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
The use of only one consultant allowed the authors to control for variation between consultants, thereby isolating the influence of patient's deprivation on doctor-patient communication.
“On the other hand the use of only one consultant in this study allowed the authors to control for variation between consultants, therefore isolating the influence of patient's deprivation on doctorpatient communication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The absence of significant correlations suggests that SES, assessed by geographic location, is a weaker indicator associated with clinical communication quality than individual-level variables such as education.
“The absence of significant correlations between IMD decile and number of cues and concerns, as well as consultant responses suggests that perhaps SES, assessed by geographic location, is a weaker indicator associated with clinical communication quality than individual-level variables such as education (11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] source
- Rests on an assumption: Area-level deprivation measured by IMD is a valid proxy for patient socioeconomic status.
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
- May combine two claims. 11
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationHealthcare professionals tend to involve low SES patients less in their consultations by giving them less information, spending less time building rapport with them and listening less attentively.
“Furthermore healthcare professionals tend to involve low SES patients less in their consultations by giving them less information, spending less time building rapport with them and listening less attentively (9,11,12).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [9] source
- cites [11] source
- cites [12] source
The 'What the doctor did in consultation' section and Table VII report that doctors perceived themselves as explaining, listening, and giving advice less often to patients in social classes IV and V. The paper does not establish that they spent less time building rapport or listened less attentively; it also cautions that patient perceptions differed less by social class than doctors’ perceptions did. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLow educated patients attached most importance to affective elements of a consultation, whereas middle and high educated patients felt that problem-solving was more important.
“The Aelbrecht et al. (24) study found that low educated patients attached most importance to affective elements of a consultation, whereas middle and high educated patients felt that problem-solving was more important.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDoctor-patient communication differs depending upon the patient's SES.
“However studies have found that doctor-patient communication differs depending upon the patient's SES (10).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationcitationThe present study's findings are in line with a previous study on patient preferences for communication style.
“This is in line with a previous study on patient preferences for communication style (24).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [24] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationMore communication is not necessarily better communication.
“Whilst we acknowledge that more communication is not necessarily better communication (25), it may be advantageous for clinicians to adopt active strategies that allow them to build rapport with lower SES patients who are keen to voice their concerns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThere was a positive correlation between IMD decile and time to first cue or concern which approached significance, r = .218, p = .077.
“There was a positive correlation between IMD decile and time to first cue or concern which approached significance, r = .218,p = .077.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThere were no significant correlations between IMD decile and the number and type of cues and concerns or the type of healthcare provider responses.
“There were no significant correlations between IMD decile and the number and type of cues and concerns or the type of healthcare provider responses.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“As can be seen in Table 4 there were no significant correlations between IMD decile and number of cues and concerns, elicitation of cues and concerns, clinician responses to cues and concerns, type of cues and proportion of concerns to cues.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“In the present study no significant correlations were found between IMD decile and number of cues and concerns, elicitation, or consultant responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Results · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningLow SES patients are quick to express any issues to their consultant, with relatively little small-talk around these or other issues.
“It may be that low SES patients are quick to express any issues to their consultant, with relatively little small-talk around these or other issues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningShorter consultations suggest that less time is invested in either providing elaborate answers to patients' concerns or with rapport building.
“Shorter consultations suggest that less time is invested in either providing elaborate answers to patients' concerns or with rapport building.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationLow SES patients tend to participate less actively in consultations, for example asking fewer questions, as well as being less likely to express emotions and spontaneously volunteer information.
“Low SES patients tend to participate less actively in consultations, for example asking fewer questions, as well as being less likely to express emotions and spontaneously volunteer information (11).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationcitationHigher SES patients may have received more elaborate clinician responses to their cues and concerns.
“Alternatively, higher SES patients may have received more elaborate clinician responses to their cues and concerns, although we note that the clinician did not favour higher or lower SES groups in eliciting concerns.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPatient participation is linked to positive patient outcomes such as improved quality of life, reduced anxiety and depression, greater satisfaction, better sharing of information, and better treatment adherence.
“Research suggests that patient participation is linked to positive patient outcomes such as improved quality of life, reduced anxiety and depression, greater satisfaction, better sharing of information, and better treatment adherence (6)(7)(8)(9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe negative association when consultation length was controlled does not show that lower SES patients expressed more cues and concerns, but that a greater amount of time was taken in discussions between patients and their consultant during which patients did not express cues or concerns.
“This does not show that lower SES patients expressed more cues and concerns, but that a greater amount of time was taken in discussions between patients and their consultant during which patients did not express cues or concerns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThere may have been greater general discussion and rapport building.
“There may have been greater general discussion and rapport building.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataLess communication exists between lower SES patients and their clinician, possibly because patients are quicker to broach their concerns.
“However, our findings suggest that less communication exists between lower SES patients and their clinician, possibly because patients are quicker to broach their concerns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Area-level deprivation measured by IMD is a valid proxy for patient socioeconomic status.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationBuilding rapport is an important aspect of clinical communication with a number of benefits for patients.
“Nonetheless, building rapport is an important aspect of clinical communication with a number of benefits for patients (5,(7)(8)(9), and low SES patients may be placed at a disadvantage if less time is spent building rapport.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe sample size may have been too small to detect any significant differences.
“Firstly only 110 audiotapes were analysed as part of this study, therefore the sample size may have been too small to detect any significant differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningLow SES patients may be placed at a disadvantage if less time is spent building rapport.
“Nonetheless, building rapport is an important aspect of clinical communication with a number of benefits for patients (5,(7)(8)(9), and low SES patients may be placed at a disadvantage if less time is spent building rapport.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll procedures performed in this study were approved by and in accordance with the ethical standards of the Clinical Audit Department, University Hospital Aintree, University of St Andrews School of Medicine and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
“All procedures performed in this study were approved by and in accordance with the ethical standards of the Clinical Audit Department, University Hospital Aintree, University of St Andrews School of Medicine and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationHigh SES patients were more interested in receiving information and engaging in problem-solving during the consultation.
“It may be that in the present study high SES patients were more interested in receiving information and engaging in problem-solving during the consultation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenInformed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
“Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningBecause IMD scores pertain to postcodes, an individual may live in an area with a high level of deprivation but be high SES in terms of education or occupation.
“As IMD scores pertain to postcodes, it is possible that although an individual may live in an area with a high level of deprivation they may be high SES in terms of education or occupation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Few studies have explored the effect of socioeconomic differences on patient communication with head and neck cancer patients, and none have used LoD as a measure of SES.
“Few studies have explored the effect of socioeconomic differences on patient communication with head and neck cancer patients, and none have used LoD as a measure of SES.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The UK National Health Service provides theoretically equal access to health services across the SES spectrum.
“The UK National Health Service provides theoretically equal access to health services across the SES spectrum, allowing a systematic comparison between higher and lower SES individuals.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Area-level deprivation measured by IMD is a valid proxy for patient socioeconomic status.
“Patient SES was measured using Indices of Multiple Deprivation (17) scores which were split into deciles.”
Cites
Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters
Hall, J. A., Roter, D. L., & Katz, N. R. (1988) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198807000-00002 · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
Area, Class and Health: Should we be Focusing on Places or People?
MacIntyre, S., MacIver, S., & Sooman, A. (1993) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279400019310 · Cited by 1,066 · see citing works
Why the nation needs a policy push on patient-centered health care
Epstein, R. M., Fiscella, K., Lesser, C. S., & Stange, K. C. (2010) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0888 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians' communication behavior
Arora, N. K. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00449-5 · Cited by 661 · see citing works
Siminoff, L. A., Graham, G. C., & Gordon, N. H. (2006) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.011 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
The social gradient in doctor-patient communication
Verlinde, E., De Laender, N., De Maesschalck, S., Deveugele, M., & Willems, S. (2012) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/1475-9276-11-12 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Zimmermann, C., Piccolo, L. D., Bensing, J. M., Bergvik, S., de Haes, J. C. J. M., Eide, H., Fletcher, I. J., Goss, C., Heaven, C. M., Humphris, G. M., et al. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.03.017 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Self-citationPatient participation in deciding breast cancer treatment and subsequent quality of life
Street, R. L., & Voigt, B. (1997) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x9701700306 · Cited by 258 · see citing works
Reijneveld, S. A. (1998) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/27.1.33 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
Piccolo, L. D., de Haes, J. C. J. M., Heaven, C. M., Jansen, J., Verheul, W., Bensing, J. M., Bergvik, S., Deveugele, M. I., Eide, H., Fletcher, I. J., et al. (2010) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2010.02.024 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Self-citationMorris, J., & Royle, G. T. (1988) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(88)90021-4 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Reijneveld, S. A., & Schene, A. H. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.1.2 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Elmore, N., Burt, J., Abel, G., Maratos, F. A., Montague, J., Campbell, J., & Roland, M. (2016) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp16x687733 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Quality of life perspectives in patients with oral cancer
Rogers, S. N. (2010) · Oral Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2010.02.021 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citationPiccolo, L. D., Finset, A., Mellblom, A. V., Figueiredo‐Braga, M., Korsvold, L., Zhou, Y., Zimmermann, C., & Humphris, G. M. (2017) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2017.06.026 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationPatterns in clinicians’ responses to patient emotion in cancer care
Finset, A., Heyn, L. G., & Ruland, C. M. (2013) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.04.023 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Why patients consult and what happens when they do
Martin, E., Russell, D., Goodwin, S., Chapman, R., North, M., & Sheridan, P. (1991) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.303.6797.289 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Aelbrecht, K., Rimondini, M., Bensing, J., Moretti, F., Willems, S., Mazzi, M., Fletcher, I., & Deveugele, M. (2015) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-014-9569-6 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Auluck, A., Walker, B. B., Hislop, G., Lear, S. A., Schuurman, N., & Rosin, M. P. (2014) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-316 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Patient Expression of Emotions and Neurologist Responses in First Multiple Sclerosis Consultations
Piccolo, L. D., Pietrolongo, E., Radice, D., Tortorella, C., Confalonieri, P. A., Pugliatti, M., Lugaresi, A., Giordano, A., Heesen, C., Solari, A., et al. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127734 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Rylands, J., Lowe, D., & Rogers, S. N. (2015) · Oral Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2015.10.017 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Self-citationIs social inequality related to different patient concerns in routine oral cancer follow-up clinics?
Allen, S. J., Lowe, D., Harris, R. V., Brown, S., & Rogers, S. N. (2016) · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · doi:10.1007/s00405-016-4208-x · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Self-citationReijneveld, S. A., Verheij, R. A., & de Bakker, D. H. (1999) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.53.7.444 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rogers, S. N., Allmark, C., Bekiroglu, F., Edwards, R. T., Fabbroni, G., Flavel, R., Highet, V., Ho, M. W. S., Humphris, G. M., Jones, T. M., et al. (2020) · European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology · doi:10.1007/s00405-020-06077-6 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationAllen, S., Rogers, S., Brown, S., & Harris, R. V. (2020) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.13163 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationLloyd‐Williams, M., Shiels, C., Dowrick, C. F., & Kissane, D. W. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13112537 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“Additionally, consultations for patients from more deprived areas are shorter [37].”
BackgroundFordham, B., Smith, T. O., Lamb, S. E., Morris, A., & Winter, S. C. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064269 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Turner, J. R., Hammond, D., & Goodson, M. L. (2020) · British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.08.090 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Gössi, F., Arpagaus, A., Groß, S., Zumbrunn, S. K., Bissmann, B., Hunziker, S., & Becker, C. R. (2025) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2025.109386 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Holländer-Mieritz, C., Elsborg, A. M. J., Kristensen, C. A., et al. (2022) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-022-07471-y · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“In addition, in the follow-up consultations, the PCIHNC follow-up has been assessed as to how it changes the consultation [10, 11]; here, it was found that the PCI approach allows for a more patient-centered holistic conversation in the routine follow-up clinic, but it lengthens the consultation time on average by one…”
BackgroundSelf-citationRomeiro, F. B., de Castro, E. K., & Carlotto, M. S. (2024) · Quaderns de Psicologia · doi:10.5565/rev/qpsicologia.1972
“Consultas mais curtas sugerem que menos tempo é gasto pelos cirurgi-ões respondendo às suas preocupações ou construindo um relacionamento (Allen et al., 2018).”
BackgroundGössi, F., Arpagaus, A., Groß, S., et al. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5244076
- Authors
- Allen, S., Harris, R., Brown, S. L., Humphris, G., Zhou, Y., & Rogers, S. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- University of St Andrews (GB)
- Edge Hill University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Allen, S.
- Harris, R.
- Brown, S.L.
- Humphris, G.
- Zhou, Y.
- Rogers, S.N.
- Venue
- British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-07
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 536-539
- ISSN
- 0266-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2808297839
- Semantic Scholar
- 0098ef88516ab472faf181cee571459e03c2b1d9
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 1.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Edge Hill University (submittedVersion)
- St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care - Greater Manchester
- National Institute for Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- socioeconomic deprivation, head and neck cancer, patient concerns, physician-patient communication, follow-up clinic, consultation time, health disparities
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Communication, Emotions, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Physician-Patient Relations, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review