The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomized Trial of a Portable, Self-administered Decision Aid for Postmenopausal Women Considering Long-term Preventive Hormone Therapy
Abstract
Although practice guidelines suggest that postmenopausal women learn about the benefits and nsks and consider their values when deciding about hormone therapy, the optimal decision-support method has not been established. In a randomized controlled trial, the authors compared the efficacy of a general educational pamphlet with that of a tailored decision aid. The pamphlet briefly summarized benefits, risks, and likely beneficiaries in general terms. The decision aid, delivered via booklet and audiotape, provided: detailed benefits and risks using functional terms and probabilities tailored to clinical risk; and steps for considering the issue in a woman's own situation, including a value-clarification exercise. Compared with the pamphlet group, the decision-aid group had statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvements in terms of realistic personal expectations of the benefits and nsks, decisional conflict, and perceived acceptability of the intervention. Levels of general knowledge about the main benefits and nsks were comparable for the two interventions It is concluded that tailored decision aids prepare women for decision making better than do general pamphlets. Key words: decision making; choice behavior; informed consent; decision-support techniques; woman education; woman participation; health education; consumer satisfaction; hormone replacement therapy; menopause. (Med Decis Making 1998;18:295-303)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Incorporating Patients' Preferences into Medical Decisions
Kassirer, J. P. (1994) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199406303302611 · Cited by 415
Patient-specific decisions about hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women
Col, N. F. (1997) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03540380054031 · Cited by 229
Cited by
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions
Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Lewis, K., Barry, M. J., Bennett, C. L., Eden, K. B., Holmes-Rovner, M., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Lyddiatt, A., Thomson, R., et al. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001431.pub5 · Cited by 6,685
Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review
O'Connor, A. M., Rostom, A., Fiset, V., Tetroe, J., Entwistle, V., Llewellyn-Thomas, H., Holmes-Rovner, M., Barry, M., & Jones, J. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.731 · Cited by 873
Self-citationDurand, M.-A., Witt, J., Joseph-Williams, N., Newcombe, R. G., Politi, M. C., Sivell, S., & Elwyn, G. (2015) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.009 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Connor, A. M., Tugwell, P., Wells, G. A., Elmslie, T., Jolly, E., Hollingworth, G., Mcpherson, R., Drake, E., Hopman, W., & Mackenzie, T.
- Venue
- Medical Decision Making
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-303
- ISSN
- 0272-989X (ISSN-L)
- 1552-681X
- OpenAlex
- W2084030961
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 45.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Trial of a Portable, Self-administered Decision Aid for Postmenopausal Women Considering Long-term Preventive Hormone Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0272989x9801800307
- The paper
- O'Connor, A. M., Tugwell, P., Wells, G. A., Elmslie, T., Jolly, E., Hollingworth, G., Mcpherson, R., Drake, E., Hopman, W., & Mackenzie, T. (1998). Randomized Trial of a Portable, Self-administered Decision Aid for Postmenopausal Women Considering Long-term Preventive Hormone Therapy. Medical Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9801800307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.