Cited by 415Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementPalliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

Incorporating Patients' Preferences into Medical Decisions

Kassirer, Jerome P.·1994·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

As our medical decisions become more and more standardized and codified, we should take care to ensure that critical therapeutic choices are not based exclusively on formal guidelines. Many decisions need to be individualized, especially when they involve choices between possible outcomes that may be viewed differently by different patients. In such cases we should identify a patient's preferences scrupulously -- a point underscored by O'Meara and colleagues in this issue of the Journal1. They present a decision analysis of the choice between heparin alone and streptokinase plus heparin in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. The result helps . . .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199406303302611

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shared decision-making has been advocated as an approach to improving the quality of preference-sensitive medical decisions.

    “Shared decision-making has been advocated as an approach to improving the quality of these so-called preference-sensitive medical decisions113, 114.”

    From Diabetes in Older Adults: A Consensus Report (2012) · cites this paper as [113]

  • One simulation model estimated the benefits of lowering A1C from 8.0% to 7.0% for hypothetical older diabetes patients with varying levels of age, comorbidity, and functional status.

    “One such model estimated the benefits of lowering A1C from 8.0% to 7.0% for hypothetical older diabetes patients with varying levels of age, comorbidity, and functional status 113..”

    From Diabetes in Older Adults: A Consensus Report (2012) · cites this paper as [113]

  • The model suggests that life expectancy averages less than 5 years for patients age 60-64 years with 7 additional index points, age 65-69 years with 6 additional points, age 70-74 years with 5 additional points, and age 75-79 years with 4 additional points.

    “This model suggests that life expectancy averages less than 5 years for: patients age 60–64 years with 7 additional index points (points due to comorbid conditions and functional impairments), age 65–69 years with 6 additional points, age 70– 74 years with 5 additional points, and age 75–79 years with 4 additional points.”

    From Diabetes in Older Adults: A Consensus Report (2012) · cites this paper as [113]

  • A combination of multiple comorbid illnesses and functional impairments was a better predictor of limited life expectancy and diminished benefits of intensive glucose control than age alone.

    “A combination of multiple comorbid illnesses and functional impairments was a better predictor of limited life expectancy and diminished benefits of intensive glucose control than age alone.”

    From Diabetes in Older Adults: A Consensus Report (2012) · cites this paper as [113]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kassirer, J. P.
Corresponding author
Kassirer, Jerome P.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1994-06-30
Volume
330
Issue
26
Pages
1895-1896
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2036076105
Cited by
415
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 12
FWCI
68.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
Keywords
patient preferences, clinical guidelines, deep vein thrombosis, heparin, streptokinase, decision analysis, treatment selection
MeSH terms
Cerebral Hemorrhage, Decision Making, Heparin, Humans, Patient Participation, Postphlebitic Syndrome, Streptokinase, Thrombophlebitis, Thrombolytic Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review