Cited by 60Management and Marketing EducationStudent Assessment and FeedbackInnovations in Medical Education

Viva Voce (Oral Examination) as an Assessment Method: Insights From Marketing Students

Pearce, Glenn, Lee, Geoffrey·2009·Journal of Marketing Education

Abstract

Viva voce (viva) or oral examinations are widely used in medical education, clinical examinations, and doctoral defenses, yet the assessment method is seldom adopted by university marketing departments. Correspondingly, the marketing education literature makes no reference to vivas as an alternative academic assessment technique. This research discusses the use of viva as a summative assessment method in university marketing education. Final-year marketing students undertaking an elective unit in services marketing were given an end-of-unit viva instead of a written examination. Fifty-four cartoon completion tests were analyzed to gain insight into student perceptions of the viva assessment task. Interpretive findings from this study suggest that viva is a valid and novel method of assessing learning outcomes such as application of deep learning, application of theory to practice, and problem-solving skills. The vivas enabled dialectic communication between the examiner and student and provided invaluable experience for career interviews. Although some students were anxious prior to the viva examination, on reflection they conceded that the process was user friendly. Based on these findings, implications for the adoption of vivas as an assessment method are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0273475309334050

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Pearce, G., & Lee, G.
Affiliations
Western Sydney University (AU)
Venue
Journal of Marketing Education
Published
2009-04-08
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
120-130
ISSN
  • 0273-4753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6550
OpenAlex
W2150931333
Cited by
60
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Marketing Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Management and Marketing Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
viva voce, oral examination, summative assessment, marketing education, service marketing, student perceptions, assessment validity, deep learning, problem-solving skills, job interviews, test anxiety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review