The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From Policy “Frames” to “Framing”: Theorizing a More Dynamic, Political Approach
Open accessAbstract
The concept of frames or framing, especially cast as “frame analysis,” has an established history in public policy. Taking off from the work of Donald Schön and Martin Rein, we develop the idea of policy analytic fram ing, the more dynamic of the two terms, in ways that strengthen what we see as its promise for a more process-oriented and politically sensitive understanding of the activities it is used to characterize. We argue that such an approach needs to engage the following aspects of the work that framing does: sense-making; selecting, naming, and categorizing; and storytelling. In addition, frame theorizing needs to engage not only the way issues are framed but also the intertwining of framing and frame-makers’ identities, and the meta-communicative framing of policy processes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497 · cited 1×
“…Rein & Schön, 1977; Schön, 1979/1993; Schön & Rein 1994, 1996), artificial intelligence and psychology (e.g., Minsky, 1975; Schank & Abelson, 1977; Tversky & Kahneman, 1981), linguistics (e.g., Fillmore, 1982; Lakoff, 1987; Tannen, 1979; see Cienki, 2007), social movement studies (e.g., Gamson,…”
Dilemmas in a general theory of planning
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/bf01405730 · Cited by 16,338 · cited 1×
“First, the unintended consequences of governmental policies and the limits of “technical rationality” (Schön, 1983) began at that time to become increasingly visible (see, for example, Rein & Schön, 1977; Rittel & Webber, 1973; Schön, 1979/1993).”
BackgroundFraming: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm
Entman, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x · Cited by 16,203
Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services
Lipsky, M. (1981) · Michigan Law Review · doi:10.2307/1288305 · Cited by 8,981
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001 · Cited by 6,188
Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work
Orlikowski, W. J. (2007) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840607081138 · Cited by 3,248
Dewulf, A., Gray, B., Putnam, L., Lewicki, R., Aarts, N., Bouwen, R., & van Woerkum, C. (2009) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726708100356 · Cited by 470
Hisschemöller, M., & Hoppe, R. (1995) · Knowledge and Policy · doi:10.1007/bf02832229 · Cited by 344
Cited by
Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008 · Cited by 948
Oliver, K., & Pearce, W. (2017) · Palgrave Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-017-0045-9 · Cited by 79
(Mis-)matching framing foci: Understanding policy consensus among coastal governance frames
Aukes, E., Lulofs, K., & Bressers, H. (2020) · Ocean & Coastal Management · doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2020.105286 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- van Hulst, M., & Yanow, D.
- Venue
- The American Review of Public Administration
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-05-30
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 92-112
- ISSN
- 0275-0740 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3357
- OpenAlex
- W2036937319
- Cited by
- 548
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 76.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From Policy “Frames” to “Framing”: Theorizing a More Dynamic, Political Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0275074014533142
- The paper
- van Hulst, M., & Yanow, D. (2016). From Policy “Frames” to “Framing”: Theorizing a More Dynamic, Political Approach. The American Review of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014533142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
