The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Observability-based Rules for Designing Consistent EKF SLAM Estimators
Abstract
In this work, we study the inconsistency problem of extended Kalman filter (EKF)-based simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) from the perspective of observability. We analytically prove that when the Jacobians of the process and measurement models are evaluated at the latest state estimates during every time step, the linearized error-state system employed in the EKF has an observable subspace of dimension higher than that of the actual, non-linear, SLAM system. As a result, the covariance estimates of the EKF undergo reduction in directions of the state space where no information is available, which is a primary cause of the inconsistency. Based on these theoretical results, we propose a general framework for improving the consistency of EKF-based SLAM. In this framework, the EKF linearization points are selected in a way that ensures that the resulting linearized system model has an observable subspace of appropriate dimension. We describe two algorithms that are instances of this paradigm. In the first, termed observability constrained (OC)-EKF, the linearization points are selected so as to minimize their expected errors (i.e. the difference between the linearization point and the true state) under the observability constraints. In the second, the filter Jacobians are calculated using the first-ever available estimates for all state variables. This latter approach is termed first-estimates Jacobian (FEJ)-EKF. The proposed algorithms have been tested both in simulation and experimentally, and are shown to significantly outperform the standard EKF both in terms of accuracy and consistency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation: Theory, Algorithms and Software
Bar‐Shalom, Y., Li, X. ‐., & Kirubarajan, T. (2002) · doi:10.1002/0471221279 · Cited by 6,782
Nonlinear controllability and observability
Hermann, R., & Krener, A. (1977) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1977.1101601 · Cited by 2,374 · cited 6×
“This analysis is based on the observability rank condition introduced by Hermann and Krener (1977).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Cited by
High-precision, consistent EKF-based visual-inertial odometry
Li, M., & Mourikis, A. I. (2013) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913481251 · Cited by 813
Self-citationCamera-IMU-based localization: Observability analysis and consistency improvement
Hesch, J. A., Kottas, D. G., Bowman, S. L., & Roumeliotis, S. I. (2014) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364913509675 · Cited by 245
Self-citationOn the Consistency of Vision-Aided Inertial Navigation
Kottas, D. G., Hesch, J. A., Bowman, S. L., & Roumeliotis, S. I. (2013) · Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-00065-7_22 · Cited by 76
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, G. P., Mourikis, A. I., & Roumeliotis, S. I.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Robotics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12-11
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 502-528
- ISSN
- 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3176
- OpenAlex
- W2027055074
- Cited by
- 272
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Observability-based Rules for Designing Consistent EKF SLAM Estimators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0278364909353640
- The paper
- Huang, G. P., Mourikis, A. I., & Roumeliotis, S. I. (2010). Observability-based Rules for Designing Consistent EKF SLAM Estimators. The International Journal of Robotics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364909353640
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.