The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning the semantics of object–action relations by observation
Open accessAbstract
Recognizing manipulations performed by a human and the transfer and execution of this by a robot is a difficult problem. We address this in the current study by introducing a novel representation of the relations between objects at decisive time points during a manipulation. Thereby, we encode the essential changes in a visual scenery in a condensed way such that a robot can recognize and learn a manipulation without prior object knowledge. To achieve this we continuously track image segments in the video and construct a dynamic graph sequence. Topological transitions of those graphs occur whenever a spatial relation between some segments has changed in a discontinuous way and these moments are stored in a transition matrix called the semantic event chain (SEC). We demonstrate that these time points are highly descriptive for distinguishing between different manipulations. Employing simple sub-string search algorithms, SECs can be compared and type-similar manipulations can be recognized with high confidence. As the approach is generic, statistical learning can be used to find the archetypal SEC of a given manipulation class. The performance of the algorithm is demonstrated on a set of real videos showing hands manipulating various objects and performing different actions. In experiments with a robotic arm, we show that the SEC can be learned by observing human manipulations, transferred to a new scenario, and then reproduced by the machine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 · Cited by 7,433
Video Google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos
Sivic, & Zisserman (2003) · Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2003.1238663 · Cited by 6,367
Harnad, S. (1990) · Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena · doi:10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6 · Cited by 4,235 · cited 1×
“Thus, it is difficult to find ways for an agent to learn cause–effect rules by itself (without explicit interference of a supervisor, see the ‘grounding problem’ (Harnad 1990)).”
BackgroundThe role of context in object recognition
Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.09.009 · Cited by 1,063
Object Recognition in the Geometric Era: A Retrospective
Mundy, J. L. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11957959_1 · Cited by 100
Cited by
Bajcsy, R., Aloimonos, Y., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2018) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1007/s10514-017-9615-3 · Cited by 328
Recognising complex activities with histograms of relative tracklets
Stein, S., & McKenna, S. J. (2017) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2016.08.012 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Aksoy, E. E., Abramov, A., Dörr, J., Ning, K., Dellen, B., & Wörgötter, F.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Robotics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-08-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1229-1249
- ISSN
- 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3176
- OpenAlex
- W2045225768
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 25.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning the semantics of object–action relations by observation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0278364911410459
- The paper
- Aksoy, E. E., Abramov, A., Dörr, J., Ning, K., Dellen, B., & Wörgötter, F. (2011). Learning the semantics of object–action relations by observation. The International Journal of Robotics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364911410459
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.