The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Challenging data sets for point cloud registration algorithms
Open accessAbstract
The number of registration solutions in the literature has bloomed recently. The iterative closest point, for example, could be considered as the backbone of many laser-based localization and mapping systems. Although they are widely used, it is a common challenge to compare registration solutions on a fair base. The main limitation is to overcome the lack of accurate ground truth in current data sets, which usually cover environments only over a small range of organization levels. In computer vision, the Stanford 3D Scanning Repository pushed forward point cloud registration algorithms and object modeling fields by providing high-quality scanned objects with precise localization. We aim to provide similar high-caliber working material to the robotic and computer vision communities but with sceneries instead of objects. We propose eight point cloud sequences acquired in locations covering the environment diversity that modern robots are susceptible to encounter, ranging from inside an apartment to a woodland area. The core of the data sets consists of 3D laser point clouds for which supporting data (Gravity, Magnetic North and GPS) are given for each pose. A special effort has been made to ensure global positioning of the scanner within mm-range precision, independent of environmental conditions. This will allow for the development of improved registration algorithms when mapping challenging environments, such as those found in real-world situations.1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object modeling by registration of multiple range images
Chen, Y., & Medioni, G. (2002) · Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/robot.1991.132043 · Cited by 1,409
Two years of Visual Odometry on the Mars Exploration Rovers
Maimone, M., Cheng, Y., & Matthies, L. (2007) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20184 · Cited by 655 · cited 2×
“After a simple error propagation, we can approximate σt to be under 1.8 mm and σθ to be under 0.006 rad, which is consistent with the level of precision reported by Maimone et al. (2007).”
MethodResultInfluential
Cited by
A Review of Point Cloud Registration Algorithms for Mobile Robotics
Pomerleau, F., Colas, F., & Siegwart, R. (2015) · Foundations and Trends® in Robotics · doi:10.1561/2300000035 · Cited by 717
Self-citationLi, L., Yang, F., Zhu, H., Li, D., Li, Y., & Tang, L. (2017) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs9050433 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Pomerleau, F., Liu, M., Colas, F., & Siegwart, R.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Robotics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-09-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 1705-1711
- ISSN
- 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3176
- OpenAlex
- W1966790179
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Challenging data sets for point cloud registration algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0278364912458814
- The paper
- Pomerleau, F., Liu, M., Colas, F., & Siegwart, R. (2012). Challenging data sets for point cloud registration algorithms. The International Journal of Robotics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364912458814
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.