The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Improved RANSAC for 3D Point Cloud Plane Segmentation Based on Normal Distribution Transformation Cells
Open accessAbstract
Plane segmentation is a basic task in the automatic reconstruction of indoor and urban environments from unorganized point clouds acquired by laser scanners. As one of the most common plane-segmentation methods, standard Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) is often used to continually detect planes one after another. However, it suffers from the spurious-plane problem when noise and outliers exist due to the uncertainty of randomly sampling the minimum subset with 3 points. An improved RANSAC method based on Normal Distribution Transformation (NDT) cells is proposed in this study to avoid spurious planes for 3D point-cloud plane segmentation. A planar NDT cell is selected as a minimal sample in each iteration to ensure the correctness of sampling on the same plane surface. The 3D NDT represents the point cloud with a set of NDT cells and models the observed points with a normal distribution within each cell. The geometric appearances of NDT cells are used to classify the NDT cells into planar and non-planar cells. The proposed method is verified on three indoor scenes. The experimental results show that the correctness exceeds 88.5% and the completeness exceeds 85.0%, which indicates that the proposed method identifies more reliable and accurate planes than standard RANSAC. It also executes faster. These results validate the suitability of the method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fischler, M. A., & Bolles, R. C. (1981) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/358669.358692 · Cited by 25,893
MLESAC: A New Robust Estimator with Application to Estimating Image Geometry
Torr, P. H. S., & Zisserman, A. (2000) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1006/cviu.1999.0832 · Cited by 2,396
Efficient RANSAC for Point‐Cloud Shape Detection
Schnabel, R., Wahl, R., & Klein, R. (2007) · Computer Graphics Forum · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.01016.x · Cited by 2,106
The normal distributions transform: a new approach to laser scan matching
Biber, P., & Strasser, W. (2004) · Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No.03CH37453) · doi:10.1109/iros.2003.1249285 · Cited by 1,554
Towards 3D Point cloud based object maps for household environments
Rusu, R. B., Marton, Z. C., Blodow, N., Dolha, M., & Beetz, M. (2008) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2008.08.005 · Cited by 1,084
Parameter estimation techniques: a tutorial with application to conic fitting
Zhang, Z. (1997) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/s0262-8856(96)01112-2 · Cited by 975
Scan registration for autonomous mining vehicles using 3D‐NDT
Magnusson, M., Lilienthal, A., & Duckett, T. (2007) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20204 · Cited by 771
Automatic creation of semantically rich 3D building models from laser scanner data
Xiong, X., Adan, A., Akinci, B., & Huber, D. (2013) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.006 · Cited by 703
USAC: A Universal Framework for Random Sample Consensus
Raguram, R., Chum, O., Pollefeys, M., Matas, J., & Frahm, J.-M. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.257 · Cited by 676
Octree-based region growing for point cloud segmentation
Vo, A.-V., Truong-Hong, L., Laefer, D. F., & Bertolotto, M. (2015) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.01.011 · Cited by 657
Cited by
Linking Points With Labels in 3D: A Review of Point Cloud Semantic Segmentation
Xie, Y., Tian, J., & Zhu, X. X. (2020) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2019.2937630 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, L., Yang, F., Zhu, H., Li, D., Li, Y., & Tang, L.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-05-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 433
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2611946301
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 16.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Improved RANSAC for 3D Point Cloud Plane Segmentation Based on Normal Distribution Transformation Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs9050433
- The paper
- Li, L., Yang, F., Zhu, H., Li, D., Li, Y., & Tang, L. (2017). An Improved RANSAC for 3D Point Cloud Plane Segmentation Based on Normal Distribution Transformation Cells. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs9050433
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.