Probabilistic movement modeling for intention inference in human–robot interaction
Abstract
Intention inference can be an essential step toward efficient human–robot interaction. For this purpose, we propose the Intention-Driven Dynamics Model (IDDM) to probabilistically model the generative process of movements that are directed by the intention. The IDDM allows the intention to be inferred from observed movements using Bayes’ theorem. The IDDM simultaneously finds a latent state representation of noisy and high-dimensional observations, and models the intention-driven dynamics in the latent states. As most robotics applications are subject to real-time constraints, we develop an efficient online algorithm that allows for real-time intention inference. Two human–robot interaction scenarios, i.e. target prediction for robot table tennis and action recognition for interactive humanoid robots, are used to evaluate the performance of our inference algorithm. In both intention inference tasks, the proposed algorithm achieves substantial improvements over support vector machines and Gaussian processes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anticipating human activities has been shown to improve human-robot collaboration.
“Anticipating human activities has been shown to improve human-robot collaboration [40, 21, 25, 10].”
From Recurrent Neural Networks for driver activity anticipation via sensory-fusion architecture (2016) · cites this paper as [40]
Cites
Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning
Rasmussen, C. E., & Williams, C. K. I. (2005) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3206.001.0001 · Cited by 11,705 · see citing works
An introduction to MCMC for machine learning.
Andrieu, C., de Freitas, N., Doucet, A., & Jordan, M. I. (2003) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1020281327116 · Cited by 2,451 · see citing works
Feature-Based Prediction of Trajectories for Socially Compliant Navigation
Kuderer, M., Kretzschmar, H., Sprunk, C., & Burgard, W. (2012) · Robotics: Science and Systems VIII · doi:10.15607/rss.2012.viii.025 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Car that Knows Before You Do: Anticipating Maneuvers via Learning Temporal Driving Models
Jain, A., Koppula, H. S., Raghavan, B., Soh, S., & Saxena, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.364 · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Recurrent Neural Networks for driver activity anticipation via sensory-fusion architecture
Jain, A., Singh, A., Koppula, H. S., Soh, S., & Saxena, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2016.7487478 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
“It has enabled robots to navigate in a social manner and perform collaborative tasks with humans while avoiding conflicts [24, 41, 21, 40].”
BackgroundBayesian nonparametric learning of cloth models for real-time state estimation
Koganti, N., Tamei, T., Ikeda, K., & Shibata, T. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2017.2691721 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Directed Acyclic Graph Neural Network for Human Motion Prediction
Li, Q., Chalvatzaki, G., Peters, J., & Wang, Y. (2021) · 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra48506.2021.9561540 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Wang, Z., Mülling, K., Deisenroth, M. P., Ben Amor, H., Vogt, D., Schölkopf, B., & Peters, J.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
- Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
- TU Bergakademie Freiberg (DE)
- Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems (DE)
- Venue
- The International Journal of Robotics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-04-18
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 841-858
- ISSN
- 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3176
- OpenAlex
- W1987616874
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 19.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The International Journal of Robotics Research (publishedVersion)
- Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Keywords
- intention inference, human-robot interaction, latent state representation, online inference, target prediction, human action recognition, humanoid robots, generative models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review