Cited by 41Robot Manipulation and Learning3D Shape Modeling and AnalysisGaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference

Bayesian nonparametric learning of cloth models for real-time state estimation

Open access
Koganti, Nishanth, Tamei, Tomoya, Ikeda, Kazushi, Shibata, Tomohiro·2017·IEEE Transactions on Robotics

Abstract

Robotic solutions to clothing assistance can significantly improve quality of life for the elderly and disabled. Real-time estimation of the human-cloth relationship is crucial for efficient learning of motor skills for robotic clothing assistance. The major challenge involved is cloth-state estimation due to inherent nonrigidity and occlusion. In this study, we present a novel framework for real-time estimation of the cloth state using a low-cost depth sensor, making it suitable for a feasible social implementation. The framework relies on the hypothesis that clothing articles are constrained to a low-dimensional latent manifold during clothing tasks. We propose the use of manifold relevance determination (MRD) to learn an offline cloth model that can be used to perform informed cloth-state estimation in real time. The cloth model is trained using observations from a motion capture system and depth sensor. MRD provides a principled probabilistic framework for inferring the accurate motion-capture state when only the noisy depth sensor feature state is available in real time. The experimental results demonstrate that our framework is capable of learning consistent task-specific latent features using few data samples and has the ability to generalize to unseen environmental settings. We further present several factors that affect the predictive performance of the learned cloth-state model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tro.2017.2691721

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koganti, N., Tamei, T., Ikeda, K., & Shibata, T.
Affiliations
  • Nara Institute of Science and Technology (JP)
  • Kyushu Institute of Technology (JP)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Robotics
Published
2017-08
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
916-931
ISSN
  • 1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0468
OpenAlex
W2615384492
Cited by
41
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (16H01749)
  • ImPACT Program of Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (Cabinet Office, Government of Japan) (2015-PM07-36-01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Gaussian Processes and Bayesian Inference
Keywords
Bayesian nonparametric models, latent manifold, depth sensors, motion capture, real-time estimation, occlusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review