Cited by 570Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobot Manipulation and LearningDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 184 of the 193 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How to train your robot with deep reinforcement learning: lessons we have learned

Open access
Ibarz, Julian, Tan, Jie, Finn, Chelsea, Kalakrishnan, Mrinal, Pastor, Peter, Levine, Sergey·2021·The International Journal of Robotics Research

Abstract

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a promising approach for autonomously acquiring complex behaviors from low-level sensor observations. Although a large portion of deep RL research has focused on applications in video games and simulated control, which does not connect with the constraints of learning in real environments, deep RL has also demonstrated promise in enabling physical robots to learn complex skills in the real world. At the same time, real-world robotics provides an appealing domain for evaluating such algorithms, as it connects directly to how humans learn: as an embodied agent in the real world. Learning to perceive and move in the real world presents numerous challenges, some of which are easier to address than others, and some of which are often not considered in RL research that focuses only on simulated domains. In this review article, we present a number of case studies involving robotic deep RL. Building off of these case studies, we discuss commonly perceived challenges in deep RL and how they have been addressed in these works. We also provide an overview of other outstanding challenges, many of which are unique to the real-world robotics setting and are not often the focus of mainstream RL research. Our goal is to provide a resource both for roboticists and machine learning researchers who are interested in furthering the progress of deep RL in the real world.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0278364920987859

Cites

184 of 184 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 193 references

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Achiam J, 2017, International Conference on Machine Learning
  2. Agarwal R, 2020, International Conference on Machine Learning
  3. Andrychowicz M, 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 5048
  4. Burda Y, 2019, International Conference on Learning Representations
  5. Cabi S, 2019, arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.12200 · arXiv
  6. Chebotar Y, 2017, International Conference on Machine Learning, 703
  7. Chen Z, 2018, International Conference on Machine Learning
  8. Clavera I, 2019, International Conference on Learning Representations
  9. Deisenroth M, 2011, International Conference on Machine Learning, 465
  10. Deisenroth MP, 2013, Foundations and Trends in Robotics, 2, 1
  11. Devlin J, 2019, NAACL-HLT
  12. Duan Y, 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1087
  13. Eysenbach B, 2018, International Conference on Learning Representations
  14. Finn C, 2017, International Conference on Machine Learning
  15. Finn C, 2016, International Conference on Machine Learning, 49
  16. Finn C, 2017, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 78, 357
  17. Fox R, 2016, Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
  18. Fu J, 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2577
  19. Fujimoto S, 2019, International Conference on Machine Learning
  20. Fujimoto S, 2018, International Conference on Machine Learning
  21. Garofolo JS, 1993, NASA STI/Recon Technical Report, 93
  22. Goodfellow I, 2014, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2672
  23. Gregor K, 2017, International Conference on Learning Representations, Workshop Track Proceedings
  24. Gu S, 2016, International Conference on Machine Learning, 2829
  25. Haarnoja T, 2017, International Conference on Machine Learning, 1352
  26. Haarnoja T, 2018, International Conference on Machine Learning
  27. Hausman K, 2017, AAAI Symposium on Interactive Multi-Sensory Object Perception for Embodied Agents
  28. Iscen A, 2018, Conference on Robot Learning
  29. Jabri A, 2019, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 10519
  30. James S, 2018, Conference on Robot Learning
  31. James S, 2017, Conference on Robot Learning
  32. Kalashnikov D, 2018, Conference on Robot Learning, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research
  33. Khadka S, 2019, International Conference on Machine Learning
  34. Kroemer O, 2019, CoRR abs/1907.03146 · arXiv
  35. Kumar A, 2019, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32
  36. Kurutach T, 2018, International Conference on Learning Representations
  37. Levine S, 2014, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 1071
  38. Levine S, 2016, The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 17, 1334
  39. Levine S, 2013, International Conference on Machine Learning
  40. Mania H, 2018, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
  41. Montgomery WH, 2016, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 4008
  42. Nagabandi A, 2020, Conference on Robot Learning
  43. Osband I, 2016, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 4026
  44. Parisotto E, 2016, CoRR
  45. Paszke A, 2017, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems Workshop on Autodiff
  46. Pinto L, 2017, International Conference on Machine Learning
  47. Rakelly K, 2019, International Conference on Machine Learning
  48. Riedmiller M, 2018, International Conference on Machine Learning
  49. Schaul T, 2019, Multidisciplinary Conference on Reinforcement Learning and Decision Making
  50. Schoettler G, 2019, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
  51. Schulman J, 2015, International Conference on Machine Learning
  52. Sener O, 2018, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 527
  53. Tedrake R, 2015, Workshop on Adaptive and Learning Systems
  54. Viereck U, 2017, Conference on Robot Learning
  55. Wu YH, 2019, International Conference on Machine Learning, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research
  56. Xiao T, 2020, International Conference on Learning Representations
  57. Xie A, 2019, arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.05538 · arXiv
  58. Xie A, 2018, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 87, 40
  59. Yang Y, 2019, AAMAS
  60. Yang Y, 2020, Conference on Robot Learning
  61. Yen-Chen L, 2020, Conference on Robot Learning

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 569

Metadata

Authors
Ibarz, J., Tan, J., Finn, C., Kalakrishnan, M., Pastor, P., & Levine, S.
Affiliations
  • Google (United States) (US)
  • Everyday Robots, X, The Moonshot Factory, Mountain View, CA, USA
Corresponding author
Ibarz, Julian
Venue
The International Journal of Robotics Research
Published
2021-01-31
Volume
40
Issue
4-5
Pages
698-721
ISSN
  • 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3176
OpenAlex
W3126321819
Cited by
570
References
193
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 38
FWCI
33.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The International Journal of Robotics Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
deep reinforcement learning, robot learning, embodied agents, physical robots, robot skill learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review