Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 565

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Robust Control of Robot Manipulators

Slotine, Jean-Jacques E.·1985·The International Journal of Robotics Research

Abstract

A new scheme is presented for the accurate tracking control of robot manipulators. Based on the more general suction control methodology, the scheme addresses the following problem: Given the extent of parametric uncertainty ( such as imprecisions or inertias, geometry, loads) and the frequency range of unmodeled dynamics ( such as unmodeled structural modes, neglected time delays) , design a nonlinear feedback controller to achieve optimal tracking performance, in a suitable sense. The methodology is compared with standard algorithms such as the computed torque method and is shown to combine in practice improved performance with simpler and more tractable controller designs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/027836498500400205

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 565

Metadata

Authors
Slotine, J.-J. E.
Venue
The International Journal of Robotics Research
Published
1985-06
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
49-64
ISSN
  • 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3176
OpenAlex
W2165643318
Cited by
565
References
0
FWCI
49.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Robust Control of Robot Manipulators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/027836498500400205
The paper
Slotine, J.-J. E. (1985). The Robust Control of Robot Manipulators. The International Journal of Robotics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836498500400205

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.