The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the Representation and Estimation of Spatial Uncertainty
Abstract
This paper describes a general method for estimating the nominal relationship and expected error (covariance) between coordinate frames representing the relative locations of ob jects. The frames may be known only indirectly through a series of spatial relationships, each with its associated error, arising from diverse causes, including positioning errors, measurement errors, or tolerances in part dimensions. This estimation method can be used to answer such questions as whether a camera attached to a robot is likely to have a particular reference object in its field of view. The calculated estimates agree well with those from an independent Monte Carlo simulation. The method makes it possible to decide in advance whether an uncertain relationship is known accu rately enough for some task and, if not, how much of an improvement in locational knowledge a proposed sensor will provide. The method presented can be generalized to six degrees offreedom and provides a practical means of esti mating the relationships ( position and orientation) among objects, as well as estimating the uncertainty associated with the relationships.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- 10.1177/027836498200100403 · DOI · Paper page
- Brooks, R.A. 1985. Visual map making for a mobile robot. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation. St. Louis: IEEE, pp. 824-829. · DOI · Paper page
- Chatila, R., and Laumond, J-P. 1985. Position referencing and consistent world modeling for mobile robots. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robotics and Automation. St. Louis: IEEE, pp. 138-145. · DOI · Paper page
- Gelb, A., 1984, Applied optimal estimation
- Nahi, N.E., 1976, Estimation theory and applications
- Paul, R.P., 1981, Robot manipulators: mathematics, programming and control
Cited by
Parallel Tracking and Mapping for Small AR Workspaces
Klein, G., & Murray, D. (2007) · 2007 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality · doi:10.1109/ismar.2007.4538852 · Cited by 4,346
Simultaneous localization and mapping: part I
Durrant-Whyte, H., & Bailey, T. (2006) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2006.1638022 · Cited by 4,199
A solution to the simultaneous localization and map building (SLAM) problem
Dissanayake, M. W. M. G., Newman, P., Clark, S., Durrant-Whyte, H. F., & Csorba, M. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/70.938381 · Cited by 2,661
Globally Consistent Range Scan Alignment for Environment Mapping
Lu, F., & Milios, E. (1997) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/a:1008854305733 · Cited by 1,304
Visual Place Recognition: A Survey
Lowry, S., Sünderhauf, N., Newman, P., Leonard, J. J., Cox, D., Corke, P., & Milford, M. J. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2015.2496823 · Cited by 1,079
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, R. C., & Cheeseman, P.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Robotics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 56-68
- ISSN
- 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3176
- OpenAlex
- W1990012555
- Cited by
- 1,579
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Representation and Estimation of Spatial Uncertainty. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/027836498600500404
- The paper
- Smith, R. C., & Cheeseman, P. (1986). On the Representation and Estimation of Spatial Uncertainty. The International Journal of Robotics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836498600500404
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.