The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Postural Stability of Biped Robots and the Foot-Rotation Indicator (FRI) Point
Abstract
The focus of this paper is the problem of foot rotation in biped robots during the single-support phase. Foot rotation is an indication of postural instability, which should be carefully treated in a dynamically stable walk and avoided altogether in a statically stable walk. We introduce the foot-rotation indicator (FRI) point, which is a point on the foot/ground-contact surface where the net ground-reaction force would have to act to keep the foot stationary. To ensure no foot rotation, the FRI point must remain within the convex hull of the foot-support area. In contrast with the ground projection of the center of mass (GCoM), which is a static criterion, the FRI point incorporates robot dynamics. As opposed to the center of pressure (CoP)—better known as the zero-moment point (ZMP) in the robotics literature—which may not leave the support area, the FRI point may leave the area. In fact, the position of the FRI point outside the footprint indicates the direction of the impending rotation and the magnitude of rotational moment acting on the foot. Owing to these important properties, the FRI point helps not only to monitor the state of postural stability of a biped robot during the entire gait cycle, but indicates the severity of instability of the gait as well. In response to a recent need, the paper also resolves the misconceptions surrounding the CoP/ZMP equivalence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
RABBIT: a testbed for advanced control theory
(2003) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2003.1234651 · Cited by 537
Forces Acting on a Biped Robot. Center of Pressure—Zero Moment Point
Sardain, P., & Bessonnet, G. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/tsmca.2004.832811 · Cited by 488
Models, feedback control, and open problems of 3D bipedal robotic walking
Grizzle, J. W., Chevallereau, C., Sinnet, R. W., & Ames, A. D. (2014) · Automatica · doi:10.1016/j.automatica.2014.04.021 · Cited by 321
Sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit transfer support for complete paraplegic patients with robot suit HAL
Tsukahara, A., Kawanishi, R., Hasegawa, Y., & Sankai, Y. (2010) · Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1163/016918610x512622 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Goswami, A.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Robotics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 523-533
- ISSN
- 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3176
- OpenAlex
- W2051287096
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postural Stability of Biped Robots and the Foot-Rotation Indicator (FRI) Point. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/02783649922066376
- The paper
- Goswami, A. (1999). Postural Stability of Biped Robots and the Foot-Rotation Indicator (FRI) Point. The International Journal of Robotics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/02783649922066376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.