The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Theory of Generalized Inverses Applied to Robotics
Abstract
Robokcs research has made extensive use of techniques based on me Moore-Penrose inverse, or generalized inverse, of matri als. Recently it has been pointed out how noninvariant results may, in general, be obtained by applying these techniques to other areas of robotics, namely hybrid control and inverse ve locity kinematics. Unfortunately, the problems are not restricted to just these particular areas in robotics but are connected with misleading definitions of the metric properties of the six- dimensional wrench and twist vector spaces used in robotics. The current definitions lead to inconsistent results (i.e., results that are not invariant with respect to changes in the reference frame andlor changes in the dimensional units used to express the problem. As a matter of fact, given a linear systemu = Ax, where the matrix A may be singular, the Moore-Penrose theory of generalized inverses may be properly and directly applied only when the vector space U of vectoru and the vector space X of vector x are inner product spaces. Arbitrary assignment of Euclidean inner products to the space U and X when the vectorsu andx have elements with different physical units can lead to inconsistent and noninvariant results. In this article the problem of inconsistent, noninvariant solutionsX s tou = Ax in robotics is briefly reviewed and a general theory for com puting consistent, gauge-invariant solutions to nonhomogeneous systems of the formu = Ax is developed. In addition, the dual relationship between rigid-body kinematics and statics is de fined formally as a particular, linear algebraic system whose solution system is also a dual system. Examples illustrate the theory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
WHOLE-BODY DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR AND CONTROL OF HUMAN-LIKE ROBOTS
KHATIB, O., SENTIS, L., PARK, J., & WARREN, J. (2004) · International Journal of Humanoid Robotics · doi:10.1142/s0219843604000058 · Cited by 293
The role of roles: Physical cooperation between humans and robots
Mörtl, A., Lawitzky, M., Kucukyilmaz, A., Sezgin, M., Basdogan, C., & Hirche, S. (2012) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364912455366 · Cited by 284
De Schutter, J., De Laet, T., Rutgeerts, J., Decré, W., Smits, R., Aertbeliën, E., Claes, K., & Bruyninckx, H. (2007) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/027836490707809107 · Cited by 265
Learning to Control in Operational Space
Peters, J., & Schaal, S. (2008) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364907087548 · Cited by 162
Ahmed, R., El Sayed, M., Arasaratnam, I., Tjong, J., & Habibi, S. (2014) · IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2014.2331062 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Doty, K. L., Melchiorri, C., & Bonivento, C.
- Venue
- The International Journal of Robotics Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-19
- ISSN
- 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3176
- OpenAlex
- W2014863553
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Theory of Generalized Inverses Applied to Robotics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/027836499301200101
- The paper
- Doty, K. L., Melchiorri, C., & Bonivento, C. (1993). A Theory of Generalized Inverses Applied to Robotics. The International Journal of Robotics Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/027836499301200101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.