Cited by 162Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsRobotic Mechanisms and DynamicsMotor Control and Adaptation

Learning to Control in Operational Space

Peters, Jan, Schaal, Stefan·2008·The International Journal of Robotics Research

Abstract

One of the most general frameworks for phrasing control problems for complex, redundant robots is operational-space control. However, while this framework is of essential importance for robotics and well understood from an analytical point of view, it can be prohibitively hard to achieve accurate control in the face of modeling errors, which are inevitable in complex robots (e.g. humanoid robots). In this paper, we suggest a learning approach for operational-space control as a direct inverse model learning problem. A first important insight for this paper is that a physically correct solution to the inverse problem with redundant degrees of freedom does exist when learning of the inverse map is performed in a suitable piecewise linear way. The second crucial component of our work is based on the insight that many operational-space controllers can be understood in terms of a constrained optimal control problem. The cost function associated with this optimal control problem allows us to formulate a learning algorithm that automatically synthesizes a globally consistent desired resolution of redundancy while learning the operational-space controller. From the machine learning point of view, this learning problem corresponds to a reinforcement learning problem that maximizes an immediate reward. We employ an expectation-maximization policy search algorithm in order to solve this problem. Evaluations on a three degrees-of-freedom robot arm are used to illustrate the suggested approach. The application to a physically realistic simulator of the anthropomorphic SARCOS Master arm demonstrates feasibility for complex high degree-of-freedom robots. We also show that the proposed method works in the setting of learning resolved motion rate control on a real, physical Mitsubishi PA-10 medical robotics arm.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0278364907087548

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peters, J., & Schaal, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • University of Southern California, 3641 Watt Way, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA, ATR Computational Neuroscience Laboratory, 2-2-2 Hikaridai, Seika-cho, Soraku-gun, Kyoto 619-0288, Japan
Corresponding author
Peters, Jan
Venue
The International Journal of Robotics Research
Published
2008-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
197-212
ISSN
  • 0278-3649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3176
OpenAlex
W2168921921
Cited by
162
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
30.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The International Journal of Robotics Research (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotic Mechanisms and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
operational space control, redundant manipulators, redundancy resolution, constrained optimal control, reinforcement learning, resolved motion rate control, humanoid robots, robotic arm control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review