The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 184 of the 185 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Immunological Variation Between Inbred Laboratory Mouse Strains: Points to Consider in Phenotyping Genetically Immunomodified Mice
Abstract
Inbred laboratory mouse strains are highly divergent in their immune response patterns as a result of genetic mutations and polymorphisms. The generation of genetically engineered mice (GEM) has, in the past, used embryonic stem (ES) cells for gene targeting from various 129 substrains followed by backcrossing into more fecund mouse strains. Although common inbred mice are considered "immune competent," many have variations in their immune system-some of which have been described-that may affect the phenotype. Recognition of these immune variations among commonly used inbred mouse strains is essential for the accurate interpretation of expected phenotypes or those that may arise unexpectedly. In GEM developed to study specific components of the immune system, accurate evaluation of immune responses must take into consideration not only the gene of interest but also how the background strain and microbial milieu contribute to the manifestation of findings in these mice. This article discusses points to consider regarding immunological differences between the common inbred laboratory mouse strains, particularly in their use as background strains in GEM.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Laboratory mouse models have been described to show considerable differences regarding the immune system regulation”
From Cross-Species Single-Cell Analysis Reveals Divergence of the Primate Microglia Program (2019) · cites this paper as Sellers et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
Pattern Recognition Receptors and Inflammation
Takeuchi, O., & Akira, S. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022 · Cited by 8,895
Defective LPS Signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr Mice: Mutations in Tlr4 Gene
Poltorak, A., He, X., Smirnova, I., Liu, M.-Y., Huffel, C. V., Du, X., Birdwell, D., Alejos, E., Silva, M., Galanos, C., et al. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5396.2085 · Cited by 7,631
Bettelli, E., Carrier, Y., Gao, W., Korn, T., Strom, T. B., Oukka, M., Weiner, H. L., & Kuchroo, V. K. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04753 · Cited by 6,992
Harrington, L. E., Hatton, R. D., Mangan, P. R., Turner, H., Murphy, T. L., Murphy, K. M., & Weaver, C. T. (2005) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1254 · Cited by 4,742
M-1/M-2 Macrophages and the Th1/Th2 Paradigm
Mills, C. D., Kincaid, K., Alt, J. M., Heilman, M. J., & Hill, A. M. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.12.6166 · Cited by 3,287
MicroRNAs Modulate Hematopoietic Lineage Differentiation
Chen, C.-Z., Li, L., Lodish, H. F., & Bartel, D. P. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091903 · Cited by 3,257
Fitzgerald, M., Hayward, I. P., Thomas, A. C., Campbell, J. H., & CAMPBELL, G. R. (1995) · Cited by 2,552
Agostini, L., Martinon, F., Burns, K., McDermott, M. F., Hawkins, P. N., & Tschopp, J. (2004) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/s1074-7613(04)00046-9 · Cited by 1,768
Trained Immunity: A Memory for Innate Host Defense
Netea, M. G., Quintin, J., & van der Meer, J. W. M. (2011) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2011.04.006 · Cited by 1,760
Signalling through C-type lectin receptors: shaping immune responses
Geijtenbeek, T. B. H., & Gringhuis, S. I. (2009) · Nature reviews. Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2569 · Cited by 1,449
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 10.1016/S0065-2776(09)01201-2 · DOI
- Demant P, 1981, Transplant Proc, 13, 1755
- Gombert JM, 1996, C R Acad Sci III, 319, 125
- Lotzova E, 1977, Biomedicine, 27, 341
- Makrigiannis AP, 2001, Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz), 49, 47
- Pavlovic J, 1993, Ciba Found Symp, 176, 233
- 10.1002/eji.1830251111 · DOI
- Tsukuba T, 2009, J Biol Chem, 145, 565
- Ward JM, 1996, Lab Anim Sci, 46, 15
Cited by
Sorted by citations
FELASA working group on revision of guidelines for health monitoring of rodents and rabbits, Mähler (Convenor), M., Berard, M., Feinstein, R., Gallagher, A., Illgen-Wilcke, B., Pritchett-Corning, K., & Raspa, M. (2014) · Laboratory Animals · doi:10.1177/0023677213516312 · Cited by 646
Cross-Species Single-Cell Analysis Reveals Divergence of the Primate Microglia Program
Geirsdottir, L., David, E., Keren-Shaul, H., Weiner, A., Bohlen, S. C., Neuber, J., Balic, A., Giladi, A., Sheban, F., Dutertre, C.-A., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.010 · Cited by 461
Heterogeneity of the gut microbiome in mice: guidelines for optimizing experimental design
Laukens, D., Brinkman, B. M. N., Raes, J., Vos, M. D., & Vandenabeele, P. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv036 · Cited by 402
Development of Immunotherapy Combination Strategies in Cancer
Yap, T. A., Parkes, E. E., Peng, W., Moyers, J. T., Curran, M. A., & Tawbi, H. A. (2021) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-20-1209 · Cited by 352
Petersen, G. H., Alzghari, S. K., Chee, W., Sankari, S. S., & La-Beck, N. M. (2016) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.04.028 · Cited by 291
Metadata
- Authors
- Sellers, R. S., Clifford, C. B., Treuting, P. M., & Brayton, C.
- Affiliations
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
- Charles River Laboratories (United States) (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sellers, R. S.
- Venue
- Veterinary Pathology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-11-30
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 32-43
- ISSN
- 0300-9858 (ISSN-L)
- 1544-2217
- OpenAlex
- W2168284316
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 185
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Veterinary Pathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Keywords
- inbred mouse strains, genetic background, genetically modified mice, immune response, genetic polymorphism, mouse strain differences
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Female, Genetic Engineering, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred Strains, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Phenotype, Polymorphism, Genetic, Models, Animal, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
