Cited by 507Ecocriticism and Environmental LiteratureSocial Sciences and HumanitiesGender and Feminist Studies

Petro-masculinity: Fossil Fuels and Authoritarian Desire

Open access
Daggett, Cara·2018·Millennium: Journal of International Studies

Abstract

As the planet warms, new authoritarian movements in the West are embracing a toxic combination of climate denial, racism and misogyny. Rather than consider these resentments separately, this article interrogates their relationship through the concept of petro-masculinity, which appreciates the historic role of fossil fuel systems in buttressing white patriarchal rule. Petro-masculinity is helpful to understanding how the anxieties aroused by the Anthropocene can augment desires for authoritarianism. The concept of petro-masculinity suggests that fossil fuels mean more than profit; fossil fuels also contribute to making identities, which poses risks for post-carbon energy politics. Moreover, through a psycho-political reading of authoritarianism, I show how fossil fuel use can function as a violent compensatory practice in reaction to gender and climate trouble.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0305829818775817

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Climate masculinities emphasize grand scales and reductionist data, rooted in approaches to the scientific domination of the planet.

    “Drawing on feminist energy researchers such as Daggett (2018) and Bell and colleagues (2020), Dunlap (2022, 154) conceptualizes climate masculinities as emphasizing grand scales and reductionist data, rooted in approaches to the scientific domination of the planet.”

    From The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Daggett (2018)

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daggett, C.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Daggett, Cara
Venue
Millennium: Journal of International Studies
Published
2018-06-20
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
25-44
ISSN
  • 0305-8298 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-9021
OpenAlex
W2809174364
Cited by
507
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 86 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 1
FWCI
218.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Millennium Journal of International Studies (publishedVersion)
  • De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Sciences and Humanities
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
fossil fuels, authoritarianism, climate change denial, racism, misogyny, white patriarchy, Anthropocene, psychopolitics, gender and climate change, identity construction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review