Petro-masculinity: Fossil Fuels and Authoritarian Desire
Open accessAbstract
As the planet warms, new authoritarian movements in the West are embracing a toxic combination of climate denial, racism and misogyny. Rather than consider these resentments separately, this article interrogates their relationship through the concept of petro-masculinity, which appreciates the historic role of fossil fuel systems in buttressing white patriarchal rule. Petro-masculinity is helpful to understanding how the anxieties aroused by the Anthropocene can augment desires for authoritarianism. The concept of petro-masculinity suggests that fossil fuels mean more than profit; fossil fuels also contribute to making identities, which poses risks for post-carbon energy politics. Moreover, through a psycho-political reading of authoritarianism, I show how fossil fuel use can function as a violent compensatory practice in reaction to gender and climate trouble.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Climate masculinities emphasize grand scales and reductionist data, rooted in approaches to the scientific domination of the planet.
“Drawing on feminist energy researchers such as Daggett (2018) and Bell and colleagues (2020), Dunlap (2022, 154) conceptualizes climate masculinities as emphasizing grand scales and reductionist data, rooted in approaches to the scientific domination of the planet.”
From The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Daggett (2018)
Cites
Wynter, S. (2003) · CR: The New Centennial Review · doi:10.1353/ncr.2004.0015 · Cited by 5,753 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The political ecologies of "green" extractivism(s): An introduction
Dunlap, A., Verweijen, J., & Tornel, C. (2024) · Journal of Political Ecology · doi:10.2458/jpe.6131 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
“Drawing on feminist energy researchers such as Daggett (2018) and Bell and colleagues (2020), Dunlap (2022, 154) conceptualizes climate masculinities as emphasizing grand scales and reductionist data, rooted in approaches to the scientific domination of the planet.”
BackgroundPaterson, M., Wilshire, S., & Tobin, P. (2024) · Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/13876988.2023.2242799 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
- Authors
- Daggett, C.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Daggett, Cara
- ORCID
- Daggett, Cara
- Venue
- Millennium: Journal of International Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-06-20
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-44
- ISSN
- 0305-8298 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9021
- OpenAlex
- W2809174364
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 86 · 2025: 123 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 218.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Millennium Journal of International Studies (publishedVersion)
- De Gruyter eBooks (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Sciences and Humanities
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
- Keywords
- fossil fuels, authoritarianism, climate change denial, racism, misogyny, white patriarchy, Anthropocene, psychopolitics, gender and climate change, identity construction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review