The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Globalisation and Inequality
Abstract
Neglected in liberal and other writings about globalisation is one particularly important feature of world politics: inequality. This chapter highlights the relationship between globalisation and inequality. It argues that inequality matters not just on grounds of equity, but is also important for understanding the nature of globalisation and its impact on world politics. Inequalities among states both shape the process of globalisation and are affected by it. The chapter describes globalisation, drawing on both an international society view of international relations and a view of the international political economy which emphasises the causes and promulgation of global inequalities. It examines four areas which illustrate the linkages between inequality and globalisation: state strength, international institutions, values and norms, and non-state actors. The liberal orthodoxy highlights the progressive enmeshment of economies and societies that results from globalisation. It emphasises the powerful international and transnational pressures that both constrain the range of viable state policies and influence the complexion of domestic politics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Moral Wrongs, Disadvantages and Disability: A Critique of Critical Disability Studies
Vehmas, S., & Watson, N. (2014) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2013.831751 · Cited by 220
Metadata
- Authors
- Hurrell, A., & Woods, N.
- Venue
- Millennium: Journal of International Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 447-470
- ISSN
- 0305-8298 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-9021
- OpenAlex
- W2076693123
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Globalisation and Inequality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/03058298950240031001
- The paper
- Hurrell, A., & Woods, N. (1995). Globalisation and Inequality. Millennium: Journal of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298950240031001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.