The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care
Open accessAbstract
The dominant drive for understanding soil has been to pace its fertility with human demand. Today, warnings about soil’s exhaustion and endangered ecology raise concerns marked by fears of gloomy environmental futures, prompting scientists and soil practitioners urgently to develop better ways of taking care of soils. Yet the pace required by ecological soil care could be at odds with the predominant temporal orientation of technoscientific intervention, which is driven by an inherently progressivist, productionist and restless mode of futurity. Through a conceptual and historical approach to the soil sciences and other domains of soil knowledge, this article looks for soil ontologies and relations to soil care that are obscured by the predominant timescape. Contemporary discussions of the future of the soil sciences expose tensions between ‘progress as usual’ – by intensifying productivity – and the need to protect the pace of soil renewal. The intimate relation of soil science with productionism is being interrogated, as ecology attempts to engage with soil as a living community rather than a receptacle for crops. In this context, and beyond science, the ‘foodweb’ model of soil ecology has become a figure of alternative human–soil relations that involve environmental practitioners in the soil community. Reading these ways of making time for soil as a form of ‘care time’ helps to reveal a diversity of more-than-human interdependent temporalities, disrupting the anthropocentric appeal of predominant timescales of technoscientific futurity and their reductive notion of innovation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001 · Cited by 6,188
(1993) · Cited by 5,568
Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences
(2000) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/s0099-1333(00)00155-5 · Cited by 5,210
Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin
Haraway, D. (2015) · Environmental Humanities · doi:10.1215/22011919-3615934 · Cited by 2,992
Hinchliffe, S. (2007) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,439
Clymo, R. S., & Whittaker, R. H. (1970) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2258550 · Cited by 2,436
(2009) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.99.4.i · Cited by 2,230
Mol, A. (2008) · doi:10.4324/9780203927076 · Cited by 2,002
The sociology of expectations in science and technology
Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006) · Technology Analysis & Strategic Management · doi:10.1080/09537320600777002 · Cited by 1,902
Cited by
Krüger, M., Weibert, A., de Castro Leal, D., Randall, D., & Wulf, V. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3476050 · Cited by 23
Soil extractivism: Political ontology of soil erasure in the European Union's agricultural politics
Hokkanen, S. (2024) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103298 · Cited by 11
The Dismal Harvest: The Uneven Landscapes of AI in Agriculture
Cieslik, K. (2026) · Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers · doi:10.1111/tran.70043 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Puig de la Bellacasa, M.
- Venue
- Social Studies of Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-09-04
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 691-716
- ISSN
- 0036-8539 (ISSN-L)
- 0306-3127
- 1460-3659
- OpenAlex
- W1777700503
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 93
- FWCI
- 278.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0306312715599851
- The paper
- Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2015). Making time for soil: Technoscientific futurity and the pace of care. Social Studies of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312715599851
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.