CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24Innovative Human-Technology InteractionEducation and experiences of immigrants and refugeesMigration and Exile Studies

"What is the Topic of the Group, Please?" On Migration, Care and the Challenges of Participation in Design

Krüger, Max, Weibert, Anne, de Castro Leal, Debora, Randall, Dave, Wulf, Volker·2021·Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
DOI 10.1145/3476050
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

An increasing number of people around the world are forced to leave their homes due to the climate catastrophe, regional conflict or poverty. In their new host countries however, refugees and migrants are frequently met by a wide range of challenges, including wider societal participation. The difficulties migrants and refugees face have also increasingly become the topic of HCI and CSCW work. In this paper we report on a three year-long project, involving refugees, migrants and activist supporters in a co-design project to develop tools that aid the process of resettling. Several aspects have challenged equal participation in the project, including divergent motives, unequal power distribution and cultural heterogeneity. Despite these challenges the project outcomes are in use and maintained beyond the project runtime through voluntary actors. We reflect on this discrepancy between process and outcome drawing on the concept of care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3476050

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many challenges for PD have been identified since its early days, including contextual factors that affect the PD work and the parties' varying motivations and agendas.

    “These include contextual factors that affect the PD work (Kraft and Bansler, 1994) and the parties' varying motivations and agendas (Krüger et al., 2021).”

    From Educational Participatory Design in the Crossroads of Histories and Practices – Aiming for Digital Transformation in Language Pedagogy (2023) · cites this paper as Krüger et al., 2021

  • Several histories and practices determined the path the course could take in terms of how PD principles were applied and the role of technology researchers.

    “We maintain that there were several histories and practices determining the path that the course could take in terms of how the PD principles were applied, and what kind of role the technology researchers were taking to encourage student teachers to adopt a more active PD stance with the school children, linked with the agendas and motivations of the different parties (see e.g., Krüger et al., 202”

    From Educational Participatory Design in the Crossroads of Histories and Practices – Aiming for Digital Transformation in Language Pedagogy (2023) · cites this paper as Krüger et al., 2021

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 113 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Krüger, M., Weibert, A., de Castro Leal, D., Randall, D., & Wulf, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Siegen (DE)
  • University of Siegen, Siegen, NRW, Germany
ORCID
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
Published
2021-10-13
Volume
5
Issue
CSCW2
Pages
1-29
ISSN
2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1145/3476050
OpenAlex
W3205441546
Cited by
23
References
113
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.acm.org/publications/policies/copyright_policy#Background (vor)
Locations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
Keywords
refugees, migrants, co-design, care, participation, resettlement, power relations, cultural heterogeneity, design tools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review