The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toxic politics: Acting in a permanently polluted world
Abstract
Toxicity has become a ubiquitous, if uneven, condition. Toxicity can allow us to focus on how forms of life and their constituent relations, from the scale of cells to that of ways of life, are enabled, constrained and extinguished within broader power systems. Toxicity both disrupts existing orders and ways of life at some scales, while simultaneously enabling and maintaining ways of life at other scales. The articles in this special issue on toxic politics examine power relations and actions that have the potential for an otherwise. Yet, rather than focus on a politics that depends on the capture of social power via publics, charismatic images, shared epistemologies and controversy, we look to forms of slow, intimate activism based in ethics rather than achievement. One of the goals of this introduction and its special issue is to move concepts of toxicity away from fetishized and evidentiary regimes premised on wayward molecules behaving badly, so that toxicity can be understood in terms of reproductions of power and justice. The second goal is to move politics in a diversity of directions that can texture and expand concepts of agency and action in a permanently polluted world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coulthard, G. S., & Alfred, T. (2010) · University of Minnesota Press eBooks · doi:10.5749/9781452942421 · Cited by 3,963
Slow Violence and the Environmentalism of the Poor
Nixon, R. (2011) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674061194 · Cited by 3,933
(2008) · Cross Connect (Southern Cross University) · Cited by 3,517
Suspending Damage: A Letter to Communities
Tuck, E. (2009) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15 · Cited by 2,857
Latour, B. (2004) · Harvard University Press eBooks · doi:10.4159/9780674039964 · Cited by 2,465
Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo
Kunz, P. R., & Douglas, M. (1969) · Review of Religious Research · doi:10.2307/3510915 · Cited by 2,010
Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance.
Bailey, F. G., & Scott, J. C. (1987) · Pacific Affairs · doi:10.2307/2758183 · Cited by 1,881
Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things
de la Bellacasa, M. P. (2011) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312710380301 · Cited by 1,511
State-of-the-science of endocrine disrupting chemicals, 2012
Bergman, Å., Heindel, J., Jobling, S., Kidd, K., & Zoeller, R. T. (2012) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.020 · Cited by 1,388
Economies of Abandonment: Social Belonging and Endurance in Late Liberalism
Povinelli, E. A. (2011) · doi:10.1215/9780822394570 · Cited by 1,293
Cited by
Environmental Politics of Reproduction
Lappé, M., Jeffries Hein, R., & Landecker, H. (2019) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev-anthro-102218-011346 · Cited by 102
The social life of the “forever chemical”: PFAS pollution legacies and toxic events
Renfrew, D., & Pearson, T. W. (2021) · Environment and Society · doi:10.3167/ares.2021.120109 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Liboiron, M., Tironi, M., & Calvillo, N.
- Venue
- Social Studies of Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-06
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-349
- ISSN
- 0036-8539 (ISSN-L)
- 0306-3127
- 1460-3659
- OpenAlex
- W2810145320
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 275.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxic politics: Acting in a permanently polluted world. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0306312718783087
- The paper
- Liboiron, M., Tironi, M., & Calvillo, N. (2018). Toxic politics: Acting in a permanently polluted world. Social Studies of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718783087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.