The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Science Studies: Bibliometric and Content Analysis
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Consistent with prior work, the majority of citations are BACKGROUND (Moravcsik and Murugesan, 1975;Spiegel-Rüsing, 1977;Teufel et al., 2006b).”
From Measuring the Evolution of a Scientific Field through Citation Frames (2018) · cites this paper as Spiegel-Rüsing, 1977
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior
Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2008) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220410810844150 · Cited by 1,607
A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation
King, J. (1987) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/016555158701300501 · Cited by 334
An interview-based study of the functions of citations in academic writing across two disciplines
Harwood, N. (2009) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001 · Cited by 255
Measuring the Evolution of a Scientific Field through Citation Frames
Jurgens, D., Kumar, S., Hoover, R., McFarland, D., & Jurafsky, D. (2018) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00028 · Cited by 212
Zhang, G., Ding, Y., & Milojević, S. (2013) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22850 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Spiegel-Rosing, I.
- Venue
- Social Studies of Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1977-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-113
- ISSN
- 0306-3127
- 1460-3659
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
