The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Extending the Social Shaping of Technology Approach: Ideology and Appropriation
Abstract
This paper explores ways in which the `social shaping of technology' (SST) approach to the technology-society relationship might be extended, by drawing on ideas which have been developed in media and cultural studies. We introduce the various approaches to the social shaping of technology by discussing, in particular, the work of Raymond Williams and Langdon Winner. We argue that the SST approach is limited on three counts. First, it fails to take account of ideology in the social shaping of technology. We argue that ideology is central to functional and symbolic encording, and suggest that designers are a key group in these processes. Second, we identify marketing as a process which is central to the shaping of technology: it plays an important part in both constructing the demand for technologies, and in informing their development. Third, we suggest that the SST approach fails to take account of the appropriation of technologies by users. Technologies offer varying possibilities for such appropriation, but these are not limitless: some technologies are more `open' than others in the range of possible uses to which they may be put. But appropriation is not just about the use of a technology: it is also about the meaning the technology has for its user. These ideas are discussed in relation to recent work on various domestic technologies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Leonardi, P. M. (2011) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/23043493 · Cited by 1,889
The social shaping of technology
Williams, R., & Edge, D. (1996) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(96)00885-2 · Cited by 917
New technology in everyday life: social processes and environmental impact
Røpke, I. (2001) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/s0921-8009(01)00183-5 · Cited by 83
The New Public Analytics as an Emerging Paradigm in Public Sector Administration
Yeung, K. (2023) · Tilburg Law Review · doi:10.5334/tilr.303 · Cited by 59
Padiyath, A., Hou, X., Pang, A., Viramontes Vargas, D., Gu, X., Nelson-Fromm, T., Wu, Z., Guzdial, M., & Ericson, B. (2024) · Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 1 · doi:10.1145/3632620.3671098 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Mackay, H., & Gillespie, G.
- Venue
- Social Studies of Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1992-11
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 685-716
- ISSN
- 0036-8539 (ISSN-L)
- 0306-3127
- 1460-3659
- OpenAlex
- W2015234269
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extending the Social Shaping of Technology Approach: Ideology and Appropriation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/030631292022004006
- The paper
- Mackay, H., & Gillespie, G. (1992). Extending the Social Shaping of Technology Approach: Ideology and Appropriation. Social Studies of Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631292022004006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.