Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ancient states and ordinary people: A feminist re-imagining of ancient Maya power and the everyday

Blackmore, Chelsea·2016·Critique of Anthropology

Abstract

Maya archaeology continues to be defined by a schism between ‘politic/s and state’ and ‘everyday life and ordinary people.’ Using feminist theory, this paper deconstructs this dichotomy by considering the intellectual history and theoretical perspectives that continue to reify these boundaries and its connections to modern neoliberal discourses. How we conceive of the state – of what it is, and how it interacts with the rest of society – is at the heart of neo-evolutionary models of state formation; these impact our understanding of how ancient Maya society operated and the ways in which power, politics and class function. Archaeological fascination with elites and rulers, both in scholarly and public circles, creates a narrative focused on individual achievement, and a quest for wealth and material access; values lauded by the neoliberal state. Alternative readings of complexity illustrate that everyday life of ordinary people is nuanced, intentional, and inherently political. Such work forces us to reconsider this dichotomy and recognize it as a dialectical and mutually constitutive process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0308275x15614632

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modern complexity narratives are rooted in and justify neoliberal ideologies advocating for an interventionist state focused on protecting economic growth at all costs.

    “These modern complexity narratives are both rooted in and justify neoliberal ideologies advocating for an interventionist state that was not interested in the common good of its citizens but rather focused on protecting economic growth at all costs (Blackmore, 2016).”

    From Archaeology in 2022: Counter‐myths for hopeful futures (2024) · cites this paper as Blackmore, 2016

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 93

  1. Abeles M, 1991, Quiet Days in Burgundy: A Study of Local Politics
  2. Ashmore W (ed) (1981) Lowland Maya Settlement Patterns . Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  3. 10.9783/9781934536414 · DOI
  4. Ashmore W and Knapp B (eds) (1999) Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives . Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  5. Ashmore W, 2004, The Terminal Classic in the Maya Lowlands: Collapse, Transition, and Transformation, 379
  6. Banfield E, 1992, Taking Sides, 150
  7. Battle-Baptiste W, 2011, Black Feminist Archaeology
  8. Blackmore C (2008 ) Challenging ‘Commoner: An Examination of Status and Identity at the Ancient Maya Village of Chan, Belize . PhD Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside.
  9. 10.7183/1045-6635.22.2.159 · DOI
  10. Brown W, 2006, The Anthropology of the State: A Reader, 187
  11. Brumfiel E, 2009, Cuicuilco, 47, 59
  12. 10.1525/aa.1992.94.3.02a00020 · DOI
  13. Brumfiel E, 1987, Specialization, Exchange, and Complex Societies, 102
  14. 10.1086/202494 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1551-8248.2008.00001.x · DOI
  16. 10.4324/9780203451779 · DOI
  17. Chase A, 1992, Mesoamerican Elites: An Archaeological Assessment, 3
  18. Chase A, 2002, La Organizacion Social Entre Los Mayas Prehispanicos, Coloniales, y Modernos, 253
  19. 10.1007/s11759-005-0003-9 · DOI
  20. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.2307/j.ctvhhhfcf.7 · DOI
  22. Dobres MA and Robb J (eds) (2000) Agency in Archaeology . London: Routledge.
  23. Durkheim E, 1964, The Division of Labor in Society
  24. Enloe C, 2000, Bananas, Beaches, and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics
  25. Euraque DA, 1998, Yaxkin, 17, 85
  26. Freidel DA, 1992, Ideology and Pre-Columbian Civilizations, 115
  27. Gailey CW, 1987, Kinship to Kingship: Gender Hierarchy and State Formation in the Tongan Islands
  28. Gailey CW, 1988, State and Society: The Emergence and Development of Social Hierarchy and Political Centralization, 77
  29. 10.1007/s10816-007-9037-1 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Gledhill J, 2000, Power & its Disguises: Anthropological Perspectives on Politics
  31. Gonlin N, 1994, Archaeological Views from the Countryside: Village Communities in Early Complex Societies, 177
  32. Goode J and Maskovsky J (eds) (2002) The New Poverty Studies: The Ethnography of Power, Politics and Impoverished People in the United States . New York, NY: NYU Press.
  33. Halperin CT (2007) Materiality, Bodies, and Practice: The Political Economy of Late Classic Maya Figurines from Motul de San Jose, Peten, Guatemala . PhD Dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside.
  34. 10.1093/oso/9780199283262.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1086/653420 · DOI
  36. 10.1215/9780822391722 · DOI
  37. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.45 · DOI
  38. Hodder I, 1982, Symbols in Action: Ethnoarchaeological Studies of Material Culture
  39. 10.1525/aa.2002.104.1.68 · DOI
  40. Iannone G and Connell S (eds) (2003) Perspectives on Ancient Maya Rural Complexity . University of California, Los Angeles: The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology. · DOI
  41. 10.1007/978-0-387-71825-5_5 · DOI
  42. (ed) Exploring gender through archaeology: Selected papers from the 1991 Boone Conference, Monographs in World Archaeology No. 11, Madison, Prehistory Press.
  43. 10.2307/971754 · DOI
  44. Joyce R, 2003, Embodied Lives: Figuring Ancient Maya and Egyptian Experience
  45. Kosakowsky L, 2012, Chan: An ancient Maya farming community, 42
  46. Kovacevich B, 2007, Mesoamerican Ritual Economy: Archaeological and Ethnological Perspectives, 67
  47. 10.1038/scientificamerican1066-19 · DOI
  48. Lohse JC (ed) (2013) Classic Maya Political Ecology: Agrarian Resource Management Political Change, and Class Histories in Upper Northwestern Belize . Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute for Archaeology, University of California. · DOI
  49. Lohse JC and Gonlin N (eds) (2007) Preface. In: Gonlin N and J Lohse (eds) Commoner Ritual and Ideology in Ancient Mesoamerica . Boulder: University of Colorado Press, pp. xvii–xxxix.
  50. Lohse JC and Valdez FC (eds) (2004) Ancient Maya Commoners . Austin: University of Texas Press.
  51. 10.1086/375870 · DOI
  52. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.37.081407.085246 · DOI
  53. Marcus J, 1998, Archaic States, 59
  54. 10.1017/CBO9780511511998.003 · DOI
  55. Marcus J, 1996, Zapotec Civilization
  56. McAnany PA, 1995, Living with the Ancestors: Kinship and Kingship in Ancient Maya Society
  57. McGuire R, 1992, A Marxist Archaeology
  58. Moore H, 1988, Feminism and Anthropology
  59. Ong A, 1987, Spirits of Resistance and Capitalist Discipline: Factory Women in Malaysia
  60. Ortner SB, 1974, Woman, Culture, and Society, 68
  61. Patterson T, 1999, Change and Development in the Twentieth Century
  62. 10.1080/08935690500122172 · DOI
  63. Pendergast D, 1992, Mesoamerican Elites: An Archaeological Assessment, 61
  64. 10.1111/j.1551-8248.2008.00009.x · DOI
  65. 10.1023/A:1018770907863 · DOI
  66. Pyburn KA, 1990, Prehistoric Maya Community and Settlement at Nohmul, Belize
  67. Pyburn KA (ed) (2004) Ungendering Civilization . London: Routledge. · DOI
  68. Rapp R, 1979, Signs, 2, 309
  69. Rector R (2009) Understanding poverty in America. National Review Online . Available at: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/228210/understanding-poverty-america/robert-rector (accessed 28 September 2013).
  70. 10.5744/florida/9780813044996.001.0001 · DOI
  71. Robin C (ed) (2012) Chan: An Ancient Maya Farming Community . Tallahassee: University Press of Florida. · DOI
  72. 10.1177/1469605302002002397 · DOI
  73. Robin C (1999) Towards an Archaeology of Everyday Life: Maya Farmers at Chan Noohol and Dos Chombitos Cik’in, Belize , PhD Dissertation, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
  74. (ed) The Chan Project Report: 2005 Season, Institute of Archaeology, Belize, pp. 85-96.
  75. Robin C, 2010, Classic Maya Provincial Politics: Xunantunich and Its Hinterlands, 315
  76. Rosaldo M, 1974, Woman, Culture, and Society, 17
  77. Sahlins MD and Service E (eds) (1960) Evolution and Culture . Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. · DOI
  78. Scott JC, 1990, Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts
  79. Scott JC, 2009, The Art of Not Being Governed
  80. Scott JC, 1985, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance
  81. Spencer H, 1974, The Evolution of Society
  82. 10.1017/CBO9780511840630 · DOI
  83. 10.2307/280140 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Vogt EZ and Leventhal RM (eds) (1983) Prehistoric Settlement Patterns . Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  85. 10.1525/9780520931954 · DOI · Paper page
  86. Weber M (1930) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism . London: Routledge.
  87. Wilk R and Ashmore W (eds) (1988) Household and Community in the American Past . Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  88. 10.1177/000276482025006003 · DOI
  89. Willey G, 1965, Prehistoric Maya Settlement in the Belize Valley
  90. Willey G, 1986, Research and Reflections in Archaeology and History: Essays in Honor of Doris Stone, 189
  91. Wobst HM (1978) The archaeo-ethnology of hunter-gatherers or the tyranny of the ethnographic record in archaeology. American Antiquity 43: 303–309. · DOI
  92. 10.1525/9780520935402 · DOI · Paper page
  93. Wylie A (1992) On scepticism, philosophy, and archaeological science. Current Anthropology 33(2): 209–214. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Blackmore, C.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz, USA
Venue
Critique of Anthropology
Published
2016-05-20
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
103-121
ISSN
  • 0308-275X
  • 1460-3721
Cited by
4
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review