The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Beyond rentiership: Standardisation, intangibles and value capture in global production
Open accessAbstract
We examine corporate rentiership in the contemporary economy and suggest that the idea we are in a moment of step-change within capitalism may be premature. Implicit in arguments for a step-change is the claim that the present-day economy emphasises unproductive or rentier forms rather than the more productive and entrepreneurial forms of the past. In contrast, we argue that to understand our current situation we need to focus on the division of labour and most especially on processes of standardisation and the rise of intangible assets. Moving from Marx’s understanding of rent as a class relation, we re-embed rent within the circuit of capital and the realm of value distribution to investigate the class dynamics (among labour, capital and the state) through which giant firms seem to generate value out of rentierism. We argue that these class dynamics include the crucial and unexplored relation between standardisation and intangibles. We suggest standardisation within the division of labour renders people, places, and things interchangeable and that, in contrast, intangible assets differentiate them. When intangible assets emerge as new forms of property, they enable owners to generate scarcity and exert direct and/or indirect control over the wider division of labour. Through examining the combined rise of standardisation and intangible assets within the technical division of labour, we demonstrate how hierarchy within the social division of labour empowers some corporations to capture value produced elsewhere within the circuit of capital.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“By achieving and leveraging network centrality -notably by controlling and connecting key nodes -actors can gain privileged access to strategic inputs, manage the circulation of information, exert control over the wider division of labour, establish standards and exclude competitors (or ensure they remain in a subordinate position), and capture value within production networks (Baglioni, Campling,”
From The Second Cold War: US-China Competition for Centrality in Infrastructure, Digital, Production, and Finance Networks (2024) · cites this paper as Baglioni, Campling, and Hanlon 2021
Citations
Cites
Global production networks and the analysis of economic development
Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2002) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290210150842 · Cited by 2,216
The High Cost of Prescription Drugs in the United States: Origins and Prospects for Reform
Kesselheim, A. S., Avorn, J., & Sarpatwari, A. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.11237 · Cited by 592
Research works printed but not linked: 89
- Aaker DA (1991) Managing Brand Equity: Capitalising on the Value of a Brand Name. New York: The Free Press.
- Aaker DA, Joachimsthaler E (2000) Brand Leadership. London: Pocket Books.
- 10.2307/j.ctt21kk1v2.3 · DOI
- Appelbaum RP (2008) Giant Transnational Contractors in East Asia: Emergent Trends in Global Supply Chains. Competition and Change 12(1): 69–87. · DOI
- Autor D Dorn D Katz LF et al. (2017) The Fall of the Labor Share and the Rise of Superstar Firms. NBER Working Paper No. 23396. Cambridge MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. · DOI
- 10.1596/1813-9450-8534 · DOI
- 10.1111/joac.12032 · DOI
- Baglioni E Campling L Mezzadri A et al. (2018) Labour exploitation and labour regimes: a research agenda. Paper presented at the Global Conference on Economic Geography Cologne.
- 10.1080/09692290.2019.1657479 · DOI
- 10.1080/03085148008538599 · DOI
- Bonancich E, Wilson JB (2008) Getting the Goods. Ports, Labor, and the Logistics Revolution. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
- Braverman H (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capitalism: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
- 10.1023/A:1013258222155 · DOI
- Campling L (forthcoming) The corporation and resource geography. In: Himley M, Havice E, Valdivia G (eds) Routledge Handbook of Critical Resource Geography. London: Routledge.
- Campling L, Colás A (2021) Capitalism and the Sea: The Maritime Factor in the Making of the Modern World. London: Verso.
- Campling L Harrison J Richardson B et al. (2021) South Korea’s automotive labour regime Hyundai motors’ global production network and trade-based integration with the European union. British Journal of Industrial Relations 59(1): 139–166. · DOI
- 10.1111/joac.12179 · DOI
- 10.4135/9781446221044 · DOI
- Chalmers R (2006) Evergreening or deciduous; Australian trends in evergreening patents. Melbourne University Law Review 30(1): 29–61.
- 10.1111/ntwe.12008 · DOI
- 10.1093/oso/9780199290727.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703907.001.0001 · DOI
- Dallas MP Ponte S Sturgeon TJ (2019) Power in global value chains. Review of International Political Economy 26(4): 666–694. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5195/jwsr.2018.662 · DOI
- 10.1257/jep.12.4.31 · DOI
- 10.1080/03085147900000009 · DOI
- Fisk C (2009) Working Knowledge: Employee Innovation and the Rise of Corporate Intellectual Property, 18900–11930. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
- Freeman JB (2018) Behemoth: A History of the Factory and the Making of the Modern World. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
- Gereffi G (1994) The organization of buyer-driven global commodity chains: How US retailers shape overseas production networks. In: Gereffi G, Korzeniewicz M (eds) Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 95‒122.
- Gereffi G, Korzeniewicz M, Korzeniewicz R P (1994) Introduction: Global commodity chains. In: Gereffi G, Korzeniewicz M (eds) Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger, pp. 1‒14.
- Gibbon P Ponte S Lazaro E (eds) (2010) Global Agro-Food Trade and Standards. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
- 10.1093/es/khj037 · DOI
- 10.1017/9781108759038 · DOI
- 10.1177/0019793915602254 · DOI
- 10.1068/d080275 · DOI
- Hanlon G (2016) The Dark Side of Management: A Secret History of Management Knowledge. London: Routledge. · DOI
- Harvey D (2006) The Limits to Capital. London: Verso.
- 10.1515/9781400888320 · DOI
- Hill FG (1958) Veblen and Marx. In: Dowd DF (ed) Thorstein Veblen: A Critical Reappraisal. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 129–150.
- 10.1093/jeg/lbn005 · DOI
- Hymer S (1970) The efficiency (contradictions) of multinational corporations. American Economic Review 60(2): 441–448.
- Hymer S (1979 [1972)]), The United States multinational corporations and Japanese competition in the Pacific. In: Cohen RB, Felton N, Nkosi M, et al. (eds) The Multinational Corporation: A Radical Approach, Papers by Stephen Herbert Hymer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 140–164.
- International Panel for Social Progress (2018) Rethinking Society for the 21st Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- 10.4337/9781788113779.00015 · DOI
- Kaplinsky R, Morris M (2001) A Handbook for Value Chain Research. Brighton: IDS.
- 10.1504/IJTLID.2018.093718 · DOI
- Kraemer KL, Linden G, Dedrick J (2011) Capturing Value in Global Networks: Apple’s iPad and iPhone. UC Irvine Working Paper, 1–11.
- 10.1177/1024529418815640 · DOI
- Lazonick W (2014) Profits without prosperity. Harvard Business Review 92(9): 46–55.
- 10.1057/9781403943729 · DOI
- Marx K (1976) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy Volume I. London: Penguin Books.
- Marx K (1981) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy Volume III. London: Penguin Books.
- Mazzucato M (2013) The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths. London: Anthem Press.
- Mazzucato M (2018) The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. London: Penguin.
- McKinsey Global Institute (2018) Superstars: The Dynamics of Firms, Sectors, and Cities Leading the Global Economy. San Francisco: McKinsey & Company.
- Meyer C (2019) Prosperity: Better Business Makes the Greater Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- 10.4324/9780203887110 · DOI
- 10.1080/03066158608438299 · DOI
- 10.2753/0577-5132550205 · DOI
- 10.1093/cpe/21.1.91 · DOI
- Nolan P, Zhang J (2010) Global competition after the financial crisis. New Left Review II 64: 97–108. · DOI
- 10.1093/cje/bem016 · DOI
- Peoples J, Sugden R (2001) Divide and rule by transnational corporations. In: Pitelis CN, Sugden R (eds) The Nature of the Transnational Firm. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, pp. 177–195.
- Ponte S Gibbon P Vestergaard J (eds) (2011) Governing through Standards: Origins Drivers and Limitations. London: Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
- 10.1002/dir.20015 · DOI
- Quentin C (2020) A materialist political economy of international corporate tax reform. PhD Thesis. Queen Mary University of London London UK.
- 10.1111/glob.12172 · DOI
- Ritzer G (1993) The McDonaldisation of Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
- Sayer A (2016) Why We Can’t Afford the Rich. Bristol: Policy Press.
- Schumpeter JA (1943) Capitalism, Socialism, & Democracy. London: Unwin University Books.
- Schumpeter JA (1964) Business Cycles: A Theoretical Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process Philadelphia: Porcupine Press.
- Schumpeter JA (2008) The Theory of Economic Development. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
- 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2007.00155.x · DOI
- 10.1093/jeg/lbu014 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511615702 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/isqu.12053 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2009.00753.x · DOI
- 10.1080/13563460903288197 · DOI
- Sweezy P (1958) Veblen on American capitalism. In: Dowd DF (ed) Thorstein Veblen: A Critical Reappraisal. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 177–198.
- 10.4324/9780203927243.pt1 · DOI
- 10.1177/0950017003017002007 · DOI
- UNCTAD (2017) Trade and Development Report 2017 – Beyond Austerity: Towards a Global New Deal. Geneva: UNCTAD.
- UNCTAD (2018) Trade and Development Report 2018: Power, Platforms and the Free Trade Delusion. Geneva: UNCTAD.
- 10.2307/1884915 · DOI
- 10.2307/1883967 · DOI
- Veblen T (2005) The Vested Interests and the Common Man. New York: Cosimo.
- Veblen T (2013) The Theory of the Business Enterprise. Mansfield Centre, CT: Martino Publishing.
- 10.2307/1880689 · DOI
- Winchester S (2018) Exactly: How Precision Engineers Created the Modern World. London: William Collins.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schindler, S., Alami, I., DiCarlo, J., Jepson, N., Rolf, S., Bayırbağ, M. K., Cyuzuzo, L., DeBoom, M., Farahani, A. F., Liu, I. T., et al. (2024) · Geopolitics · doi:10.1080/14650045.2023.2253432 · Cited by 252
Metadata
- Authors
- Baglioni, E., Campling, L., & Hanlon, G.
- Affiliations
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Campling, Liam
- Venue
- Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-03-09
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1528-1547
- ISSN
- 0308-518X (ISSN-L)
- 1472-3409
- OpenAlex
- W3135145082
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 15.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Environment and Planning A Economy and Space (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
- Keywords
- rent, standardization, intangible assets, value capture, division of labor, social division of labor, circuit of capital, Nevanlinna theory, class relations, global production, hierarchy, Karl Marx
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Beyond rentiership: Standardisation, intangibles and value capture in global production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0308518x21997835
- The paper
- Baglioni, E., Campling, L., & Hanlon, G. (2023). Beyond rentiership: Standardisation, intangibles and value capture in global production. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x21997835