The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
From ‘energy geography’ to ‘energy geographies’: Perspectives on a fertile academic borderland
Abstract
This paper takes stock of geographical contributions to the study of energy and energy futures. The paper is written in two parts. First, I trace the methodological and philosophical traditions that underpin geographical approaches to energy studies. I argue that while ‘energy geography’ is arguably a pragmatic shorthand with which to communicate to the broader energy studies community, geographical studies of energy have expanded in scope and theoretical plurality so that ‘energy geographies’ is a more appropriate label. Energy geographers are well positioned to contribute to scientific and policy debates surrounding energy due to their privileged position at the borderland between various philosophical and methodological traditions. Second, I identify some of the problems, opportunities and uncertainties that contemporary energy geographers are helping to identify, understand, and resolve. Past contributions and critical issues for future scholarship are highlighted in four themes: (1) using advanced socio-spatial theory to better understand the energy-society relationship; (2) geo-political and geo-economic assessments of (changing) global energy trade networks; (3) geographical perspectives on socio-technical (energy) transitions; and (4) advanced spatial decision-support for energy planning and technology implementation. While this discussion is by no means exhaustive, it aims to bring some clarity and specificity to the policy and academic relevance of geographical thought and practice as it relates to energy issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy
Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Eyre, N. (2013) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066 · Cited by 1,500
The political economy of the ‘just transition’
Newell, P., & Mulvaney, D. (2013) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.1111/geoj.12008 · Cited by 1,285
Sovacool, B. K. (2014) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.003 · Cited by 1,285
Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions
Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014 · Cited by 1,279
Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management
Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2007) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a39310 · Cited by 1,012
Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life
Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019 · Cited by 912
Material worlds? Resource geographies and the `matter of nature'
Bakker, K., & Bridge, G. (2006) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/0309132506ph588oa · Cited by 800
The energy ladder: Theoretical myth or empirical truth? Results from a meta-analysis
van der Kroon, B., Brouwer, R., & van Beukering, P. J. H. (2013) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.045 · Cited by 647
Leach, G. (1992) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/0301-4215(92)90105-b · Cited by 618
(2010) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203842249 · Cited by 582
Metadata
- Authors
- Calvert, K.
- Venue
- Progress in Human Geography
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-01-21
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 105-125
- ISSN
- 0309-1325 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0288
- OpenAlex
- W2328671158
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 85
- FWCI
- 112.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: From ‘energy geography’ to ‘energy geographies’: Perspectives on a fertile academic borderland. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0309132514566343
- The paper
- Calvert, K. (2016). From ‘energy geography’ to ‘energy geographies’: Perspectives on a fertile academic borderland. Progress in Human Geography. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132514566343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.