The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks
Abstract
This review considers the application of artificial neural networks (ANNs) to rainfall-runoff modelling and flood forecasting. This is an emerging field of research, characterized by a wide variety of techniques, a diversity of geographical contexts, a general absence of intermodel comparisons, and inconsistent reporting of model skill. This article begins by outlining the basic principles of ANN modelling, common network architectures and training algorithms. The discussion then addresses related themes of the division and preprocessing of data for model calibration/validation; data standardization techniques; and methods of evaluating ANN model performance. A literature survey underlines the need for clear guidance in current modelling practice, as well as the comparison of ANN methods with more conventional statistical models. Accordingly, a template is proposed in order to assist the construction of future ANN rainfall-runoff models. Finally, it is suggested that research might focus on the extraction of hydrological ‘rules’ from ANN weights, and on the development of standard performance measures that penalize unnecessary model complexity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity
McCulloch, W. S., & Pitts, W. (1943) · The Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics · doi:10.1007/bf02478259 · Cited by 18,566
Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition
Bishop, C. M. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · Cited by 12,287
Survey and critique of techniques for extracting rules from trained artificial neural networks
Andrews, R., Diederich, J., & Tickle, A. B. (1995) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/0950-7051(96)81920-4 · Cited by 1,225
Cited by
Kalteh, A. M., Hjorth, P., & Berndtsson, R. (2008) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2007.10.001 · Cited by 522
Non-linear variable selection for artificial neural networks using partial mutual information
May, R. J., Maier, H. R., Dandy, G. C., & Fernando, T. M. K. G. (2008) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2008.03.007 · Cited by 310
Neural network modeling of hydrological systems: A review of implementation techniques
Oyebode, O., & Stretch, D. (2019) · Natural Resource Modeling · doi:10.1111/nrm.12189 · Cited by 111
Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) as a Novel Modeling Technique in Tribology
Argatov, I. (2019) · Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering · doi:10.3389/fmech.2019.00030 · Cited by 97
AghaKouchak, A., Pan, B., Mazdiyasni, O., Sadegh, M., Jiwa, S., Zhang, W., Love, C. A., Madadgar, S., Papalexiou, S. M., Davis, S. J., et al. (2022) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2021.0288 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Dawson, C. W., & Wilby, R. L.
- Venue
- Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 80-108
- ISSN
- 0309-1333 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0296
- OpenAlex
- W2114824684
- Cited by
- 903
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/030913330102500104
- The paper
- Dawson, C. W., & Wilby, R. L. (2001). Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913330102500104
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.