Cited by 1,225Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Neural Networks and ApplicationsData Mining Algorithms and Applications

Survey and critique of techniques for extracting rules from trained artificial neural networks

Andrews, Robert, Diederich, Joachim, Tickle, Alan B.·1995·Knowledge-Based Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0950-7051(96)81920-4

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The approaches presented in [5] are strongly dependent on the black box b and on the specific type of decision rules c_g, and thus are not generalizable and cannot be employed to solve other instances of the black box model explanation problem.

    “The approaches presented in [5] are strongly dependent on the black box b and on the specific type of decision rules c g . Thus, they are not generalizable and can not be employed to solve other instances of the black box model explanation problem.”

    From A Survey of Methods for Explaining Black Box Models (2019) · cites this paper as [5]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrews, R., Diederich, J., & Tickle, A. B.
Affiliations
Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Venue
Knowledge-Based Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-12
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
373-389
ISSN
0950-7051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063046703
Cited by
1,225
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 33
FWCI
15.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Knowledge-Based Systems (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
Keywords
rule extraction, artificial neural networks, rule refinement, explainable AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review