The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Airborne LiDAR for DEM generation: some critical issues
Abstract
Airborne LiDAR is one of the most effective and reliable means of terrain data collection. Using LiDAR data for digital elevation model (DEM) generation is becoming a standard practice in spatial related areas. However, the effective processing of the raw LiDAR data and the generation of an efficient and high-quality DEM remain big challenges. This paper reviews the recent advances of airborne LiDAR systems and the use of LiDAR data for DEM generation, with special focus on LiDAR data filters, interpolation methods, DEM resolution, and LiDAR data reduction. Separating LiDAR points into ground and non-ground is the most critical and difficult step for DEM generation from LiDAR data. Commonly used and most recently developed LiDAR filtering methods are presented. Interpolation methods and choices of suitable interpolator and DEM resolution for LiDAR DEM generation are discussed in detail. In order to reduce the data redundancy and increase the efficiency in terms of storage and manipulation, LiDAR data reduction is required in the process of DEM generation. Feature specific elements such as breaklines contribute significantly to DEM quality. Therefore, data reduction should be conducted in such a way that critical elements are kept while less important elements are removed. Given the high-density characteristic of LiDAR data, breaklines can be directly extracted from LiDAR data. Extraction of breaklines and integration of the breaklines into DEM generation are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cressie, N. A. C. (1993) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119115151 · Cited by 6,507
Cited by
Modeling Soil Processes: Review, Key Challenges, and New Perspectives
Vereecken, H., Schnepf, A., Hopmans, J. W., Javaux, M., Or, D., Roose, T., Vanderborght, J., Young, M. H., Amelung, W., Aitkenhead, M., et al. (2016) · Vadose Zone Journal · doi:10.2136/vzj2015.09.0131 · Cited by 833
Ground Filtering Algorithms for Airborne LiDAR Data: A Review of Critical Issues
Meng, X., Currit, N., & Zhao, K. (2010) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs2030833 · Cited by 573
Li, H., Zhao, J., Yan, B., Yue, L., & Wang, L. (2022) · International Journal of Digital Earth · doi:10.1080/17538947.2022.2094002 · Cited by 126
Escobar Villanueva, J. R., Iglesias Martínez, L., & Pérez Montiel, J. I. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19143205 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, X.
- Venue
- Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-49
- ISSN
- 0309-1333 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0296
- OpenAlex
- W2092924074
- Cited by
- 635
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Airborne LiDAR for DEM generation: some critical issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0309133308089496
- The paper
- Liu, X. (2008). Airborne LiDAR for DEM generation: some critical issues. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133308089496
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.