The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations
Abstract
General circulation models (GCMs) suggest that rising concentrations of greenhouse gases may have significant consequences for the global climate. What is less clear is the extent to which local (subgrid) scale meteorological processes will be affected. So-called 'downscaling' techniques have subsequently emerged as a means of bridging the gap between what climate modellers are currently able to provide and what impact assessors require. This article reviews the present generation of downscaling tools under four main headings: regression methods; weather pattern (circulation)-based approaches; stochastic weather generators; and limited-area climate models. The penultimate section summarizes the results of an international experiment to intercompare several precipitation models used for downscaling. It shows that circulation-based downscaling methods perform well in simulating present observed and model-generated daily precipitation characteristics, but are able to capture only part of the daily precipitation variability changes associated with model-derived changes in climate. The final section examines a number of ongoing challenges to the future development of climate downscaling.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Palmer, T. N., Alessandri, A., Andersen, U., Cantelaube, P., Davey, M., Délécluse, P., Déqué, M., Díez, E., Doblas-Reyes, F. J., Feddersen, H., et al. (2004) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-85-6-853 · Cited by 959
Diaz-Nieto, J., & Wilby, R. L. (2005) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-005-1157-6 · Cited by 494
Self-citationWilby, R. L., Hay, L. E., & Leavesley, G. H. (1999) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1694(99)00136-5 · Cited by 396
Self-citationTeutschbein, C., & Seibert, J. (2010) · Geography Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00357.x · Cited by 357
Regional climate change projections for the Northeast USA
Hayhoe, K., Wake, C., Anderson, B., Liang, X.-Z., Maurer, E., Zhu, J., Bradbury, J., DeGaetano, A., Stoner, A. M., & Wuebbles, D. (2008) · Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change · doi:10.1007/s11027-007-9133-2 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilby, R. L., & Wigley, T. M. L.
- Venue
- Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 530-548
- ISSN
- 0309-1333 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0296
- OpenAlex
- W2026156015
- Cited by
- 1,480
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/030913339702100403
- The paper
- Wilby, R. L., & Wigley, T. M. L. (1997). Downscaling general circulation model output: a review of methods and limitations. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913339702100403
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.