Cited by 50Blood transfusion and managementTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, ResuscitationMaternal and fetal healthcare

Point-of-care testing of coagulation and fibrinolytic status during postpartum haemorrhage: developing a thrombelastography®-guided transfusion algorithm

Hill, J. S., Devenie, G., Powell, M.·2012·Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

Abstract

Thrombelastography® is a monitor of coagulation and fibrinolytic status, with point-of-care applications in managing haemorrhaging patients. Advocates have suggested a possible role in managing obstetric haemorrhage. This study aims to develop a pregnancy-specific thrombelastography-guided transfusion algorithm, which could be integrated into the management of postpartum haemorrhage. In this prospective observational study, 57 healthy, term-parturients provided pre-caesarean whole blood specimens for thrombelastography analyses. Specimens were processed according to a standardised protocol involving simultaneous analyses using three assays: native (non-activated); kaolin-activated; and kaolin and tissue factor-activated (RapidTEG®). For each assay, the following thrombelastography parameters were measured: reaction time (minutes); clot formation kinetics time (minutes); maximum amplitude (mm); and a angle (degree). Subsequent reference values were used to establish assay-specific reference intervals. For all thrombelastography parameters studied, reference values obtained using a non-activated assay differed from the corresponding values obtained using activated assays, and also demonstrated greater inter-sample variability. From the assay-specific reference intervals obtained, it was possible to establish a pregnancy-specific thrombelastography-guided transfusion algorithm. Specific features of this transfusion algorithm included the preferential use of activated assays, the need for duplicates and a recommendation that an initial baseline thrombelastography measurement is established for subsequent serial comparisons. This transfusion algorithm has been developed to assist with assessment of coagulation and fibrinolytic status during postpartum haemorrhage.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0310057x1204000612

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, J. S., Devenie, G., & Powell, M.
Affiliations
Auckland City Hospital (NZ)
Corresponding author
Hill, J. S.
Venue
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care
Published
2012-11
Volume
40
Issue
6
Pages
1007-1015
ISSN
  • 0310-057X (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-0271
OpenAlex
W155542165
Cited by
50
References
32
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Auckland District Health Board
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
Keywords
thromboelastography, postpartum hemorrhage, obstetric hemorrhage, transfusion algorithm, coagulation status, fibrinolysis, reference values, tissue factor activation, point-of-care testing
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Blood Coagulation, Blood Coagulation Tests, Blood Transfusion, Cesarean Section, Female, Fibrinolysis, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Humans, Reference Values, Thrombelastography, Point-of-Care Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review