The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6™) across episodic and chronic migraine
Open accessAbstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess psychometric properties of the six-item Headache Impact Text (HIT-6™) across episodic and chronic migraine. Methods: Using a migraine screener and number of headache days per month (HDPM), participants from the National Survey of Headache Impact (NSHI) study and the HIT-6 validation study (HIT6-V) were selected for this study. Eligible participants were categorized into three groups: chronic migraine (CM: ≥ 15 HDPM); episodic migraine (EM: < 15 HDPM); non-migraine headaches. Reliability and validity of the HIT-6 were evaluated. Results: A total of 2,049 survey participants met the inclusion/exclusion criteria for this study. Participants were identified as 6.4% CM; 42.1% EM; 51.5% non-migraine, with respective mean HIT-6 scores: 62.5 ± 7.8; 60.2 ± 6.8; and 49.1 ± 8.7. High reliability was demonstrated with internal consistency (time1/time2) of 0.83/0.87 in NSHI, and 0.82/0.92 in HIT6-V. Intra-class correlation for test-retest reliability was very good at 0.77. HIT-6 scores correlated significantly ( p < .0001) with total Migraine Disability Assessment Scale scores ( r = 0.56), headache pain severity ( r = 0.46), and HDPM ( r = 0.29). Discriminant validity analysis showed significantly different HIT-6 scores ( F = 488.02, p < .0001) across the groups. Conclusion: Results from these analyses confirm that the HIT-6 is a reliable and valid tool for discriminating headache impact across episodic and chronic migraine.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations
Turk, D. C., Dworkin, R. H., Allen, R. R., Bellamy, N., Brandenburg, N., Carr, D. B., Cleeland, C., Dionne, R., Farrar, J. T., Galer, B. S., et al. (2003) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.001 · Cited by 3,510
Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy
Lipton, R. B., Bigal, M. E., Diamond, M., Freitag, F., Reed, M. L., & Stewart, W. F. (2007) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000252808.97649.21 · Cited by 2,337
Olesen, J. (2004) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2003.00824.x · Cited by 2,056
Assessing proportionality in the proportional odds model for ordinal logistic regression.
Brant, R. (1990) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532457 · Cited by 1,864
A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: The HIT-6™
Kosinski, M., Bayliss, M. S., Bjorner, J. B., Ware, J. E., Garber, W. H., Batenhorst, A., Cady, R., Dahlöf, C. G. H., Dowson, A., & Tepper, S. (2003) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1023/a:1026119331193 · Cited by 1,376
Self-citationStewart, W. F., Lipton, R. B., Dowson, A. J., & Sawyer, J. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.suppl_1.s20 · Cited by 1,210
New Appendix Criteria Open for a Broader Concept of Chronic Migraine
Olesen, J., Bousser, M.-G., Diener, H.-C., Dodick, D., First, M., Goadsby, P., Göbel, H., Lainez, M., Lance, J., Lipton, R., et al. (2006) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2006.01172.x · Cited by 909
Guidelines for Controlled Trials of Drugs in Migraine: Second Edition
International Headache Society Clinical Trials Subcommittee, Tfelt-Hansen, P., Block, G., Dahlöf, C., Diener, H.-C., Ferrari, M., Goadsby, P., Guidetti, V, Jones, B., Lipton, R., et al. (2000) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00117.x · Cited by 698
Cited by
Schoenen, J., Jensen, R. H., Lantéri-Minet, M., Láinez, M. J., Gaul, C., Goodman, A. M., Caparso, A., & May, A. (2013) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1177/0333102412473667 · Cited by 358
Wells, R. E., O’Connell, N., Pierce, C. R., Estave, P., Penzien, D. B., Loder, E., Zeidan, F., & Houle, T. T. (2021) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.7090 · Cited by 183
Smitherman, T. A., Walters, A. B., Davis, R. E., Ambrose, C. E., Roland, M., Houle, T. T., & Rains, J. C. (2016) · Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.12760 · Cited by 121
Haywood, K. L., Mars, T. S., Potter, R., Patel, S., Matharu, M., & Underwood, M. (2018) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1177/0333102417731348 · Cited by 113
“1 [12,36,51], HIT-6 [53,56]) (Table 1; Appendix 7); however, for the majority, evidence was limited (n1⁄4 3), from poor quality studies (n1⁄4 3) or not available (n1⁄4 1).”
BackgroundSeminowicz, D. A., Burrowes, S. A. B., Kearson, A., Zhang, J., Krimmel, S. R., Samawi, L., Furman, A. J., Keaser, M. L., Gould, N. F., Magyari, T., et al. (2020) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001860 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, M., Rendas-Baum, R., Varon, S. F., & Kosinski, M.
- Venue
- Cephalalgia
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-09-06
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 357-367
- ISSN
- 0333-1024 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2982
- OpenAlex
- W2134578184
- Cited by
- 544
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 3.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6™) across episodic and chronic migraine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0333102410379890
- The paper
- Yang, M., Rendas-Baum, R., Varon, S. F., & Kosinski, M. (2011). Validation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6™) across episodic and chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102410379890
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
