The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: A randomized, sham-controlled study
Open accessAbstract
Background: The pain and autonomic symptoms of cluster headache (CH) result from activation of the trigeminal parasympathetic reflex, mediated through the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG). We investigated the safety and efficacy of on-demand SPG stimulation for chronic CH (CCH). Methods: A multicenter, multiple CH attack study of an implantable on-demand SPG neurostimulator was conducted in patients suffering from refractory CCH. Each CH attack was randomly treated with full, sub-perception, or sham stimulation. Pain relief at 15 minutes following SPG stimulation and device- or procedure-related serious adverse events (SAEs) were evaluated. Findings: Thirty-two patients were enrolled and 28 completed the randomized experimental period. Pain relief was achieved in 67.1% of full stimulation-treated attacks compared to 7.4% of sham-treated and 7.3% of sub-perception-treated attacks ( p < 0.0001). Nineteen of 28 (68%) patients experienced a clinically significant improvement: seven (25%) achieved pain relief in ≥50% of treated attacks, 10 (36%), a ≥50% reduction in attack frequency, and two (7%), both. Five SAEs occurred and most patients (81%) experienced transient, mild/moderate loss of sensation within distinct maxillary nerve regions; 65% of events resolved within three months. Interpretation: On-demand SPG stimulation using the ATI Neurostimulation System is an effective novel therapy for CCH sufferers, with dual beneficial effects, acute pain relief and observed attack prevention, and has an acceptable safety profile compared to similar surgical procedures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The International Classification of Headache Disorders: 2nd edition
Olesen, J., Goadsby, P., & Steiner, T. (2003) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00590-8 · Cited by 5,049
Olesen, J. (2004) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2003.00824.x · Cited by 2,056
Migraine — Current Understanding and Treatment
Goadsby, P. J., Lipton, R. B., & Ferrari, M. D. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra010917 · Cited by 1,918
The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life
Hays, R. D., & Morales, L. S. (2001) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.3109/07853890109002089 · Cited by 1,460 · cited 2×
“Tooth pain/sensitivity 5 (5%) 5 (16%) 4 (80%) (100; 54–161) 1 (3%) 1 (3%) 1 (100%) (34)”
BackgroundKunz, R., & Oxman, A. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1185 · Cited by 770 · cited 1×
“Stimulation-provoked paresthesias coupled with pain response limited the amount of blinding that could be achieved in the study, a limitation that was overcome by utilizing two non-perceived stimulation doses and one perceived stimulation dose, applied in random order with concealed allocation, which is understood to…”
BackgroundGoadsby, P. J., & Edvinsson, L. (1994) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/117.3.427 · Cited by 681
May, A., & Goadsby, P. J. (1999) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1097/00004647-199902000-00001 · Cited by 582
Self-citationValidation of the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6™) across episodic and chronic migraine
Yang, M., Rendas-Baum, R., Varon, S. F., & Kosinski, M. (2011) · Cephalalgia · doi:10.1177/0333102410379890 · Cited by 544
Cluster headache: A prospective clinical study with diagnostic implications
Bahra, A., May, A., & Goadsby, P. J. (2002) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.58.3.354 · Cited by 537
Self-citationTreatment of Acute Cluster Headache with Sumatriptan
The Sumatriptan Cluster Headache Study Group* (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199108013250505 · Cited by 429
Cited by
Treatment of Cluster Headache: The American Headache Society Evidence‐Based Guidelines
Robbins, M. S., Starling, A. J., Pringsheim, T. M., Becker, W. J., & Schwedt, T. J. (2016) · Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain · doi:10.1111/head.12866 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoenen, J., Jensen, R. H., Lantéri-Minet, M., Láinez, M. J., Gaul, C., Goodman, A. M., Caparso, A., & May, A.
- Venue
- Cephalalgia
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-01-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 816-830
- ISSN
- 0333-1024 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2982
- OpenAlex
- W1981954594
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 24.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: A randomized, sham-controlled study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0333102412473667
- The paper
- Schoenen, J., Jensen, R. H., Lantéri-Minet, M., Láinez, M. J., Gaul, C., Goodman, A. M., Caparso, A., & May, A. (2013). Stimulation of the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) for cluster headache treatment. Pathway CH-1: A randomized, sham-controlled study. Cephalalgia. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102412473667
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.