Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhanced pain-induced activity of pain-processing regions in a case-control study of episodic migraine

Open access
Schwedt, Todd J, Chong, Catherine D, Chiang, Chia-Chun, Baxter, Leslie, Schlaggar, Bradley L, Dodick, David W·2014·Cephalalgia

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to identify brain regions having aberrant pain-induced activation in migraineurs, thereby gaining insight into particular aspects of pain processing that are atypical in migraineurs. Methods: Functional magnetic resonance imaging assessed whole brain responses to painful heat in 24 adult episodic migraineurs who were at least 48 hours pain free and 27 healthy controls. Regions differentially activated in migraineurs compared to controls were identified. Activation intensities in these regions were correlated with headache frequency, number of migraine years, and time to next migraine attack. Results: Migraineurs had greater pain-induced activation of lentiform nucleus, fusiform gyrus, subthalamic nucleus, hippocampus, middle cingulate cortex, premotor cortex, somatosensory cortex, and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and less activation in precentral gyrus and superior temporal gyrus. There were significant correlations between activation strength and headache frequency for middle cingulate ( r = 0.627, p = 0.001), right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex ( r = 0.568, p = 0.004), left fusiform gyrus ( r = 0.487, p = 0.016), left precentral gyrus ( r = 0.415, p = 0.044), and left hippocampus ( r = 0.404, p = 0.050) and with number of migraine years for left fusiform gyrus ( r = 0.425, p = 0.038). There were no significant correlations between activation strength and time to next migraine attack. Conclusions: The majority of regions with enhanced pain-induced activation in headache-free migraineurs participate in cognitive aspects of pain perception such as attending to pain and pain memory. Enhanced cognitive pain processing by migraineurs might reflect cerebral hypersensitivity related to high expectations and hypervigilance for pain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0333102414526069

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Metadata

Authors
Schwedt, T. J., Chong, C. D., Chiang, C.-C., Baxter, L., Schlaggar, B. L., & Dodick, D. W.
Venue
Cephalalgia
Published
2014-03-13
Volume
34
Issue
12
Pages
947-958
ISSN
  • 0333-1024 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2982
OpenAlex
W2124070189
Cited by
159
References
8
FWCI
9.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhanced pain-induced activity of pain-processing regions in a case-control study of episodic migraine. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0333102414526069
The paper
Schwedt, T. J., Chong, C. D., Chiang, C.-C., Baxter, L., Schlaggar, B. L., & Dodick, D. W. (2014). Enhanced pain-induced activity of pain-processing regions in a case-control study of episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102414526069

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.