Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 364

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Knee Stability and Graft Function after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of a Lateral and an Anatomical Femoral Tunnel Placement

Yamamoto, Yuji, Hsu, Wei-Hsiu, Woo, Savio L-Y., Van Scyoc, Andrew H., Takakura, Yoshiyuki, Debski, Richard E.·2004·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: Locations of femoral tunnels for anterior cruciate ligament replacement grafts remain a subject of debate. Hypothesis: A lateral femoral tunnel placed at the insertion of the posterolateral bundle of the anterior cruciate ligament can restore knee function comparably to anatomical femoral tunnel placement. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten cadaveric knees were subjected to the following external loading conditions: (1) a 134-N anterior tibial load and (2) combined rotatory loads of 10-N.m valgus and 5-N.m internal tibial torques. Data on resulting knee kinematics and in situ force of the intact anterior cruciate ligament and anterior cruciate ligament graft were collected using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system for (1) intact, (2) anterior cruciate ligament-deficient, (3) anatomical double-bundle reconstructed, and (4) laterally placed single-bundle reconstructed knees. Results: In response to anterior tibial load, anterior tibial translation and in situ force in the graft were not significantly different between the 2 reconstructions except at high knee flexion. For example, at 90° of knee flexion, anterior tibial translation was 6.1 ± 2.3 mm for anatomical double-bundle reconstruction and 7.6 ± 2.6 mm for laterally placed single-bundle reconstruction (P < .05). In response to rotatory loads, there were no significant differences between the 2 reconstruction procedures (4.8 ± 2.4 mm vs 4.8 ± 3.0 mm in anterior tibial translation at 15° of knee flexion, P > .05). Conclusion: Lateral tunnel placement can restore rotatory and anterior knee stability similarly to an anatomical reconstruction when the knee is near extension. However, the same is not true when the knee is at high flexion angles. Clinical Relevance: To reproduce the complex function of the anterior cruciate ligament, reproducing both bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament may be necessary.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546504263947

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 364

Metadata

Authors
Yamamoto, Y., Hsu, W.-H., Woo, S. L.-Y., Van Scyoc, A. H., Takakura, Y., & Debski, R. E.
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2004-12
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
1825-1832
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2071207300
Cited by
364
References
34
FWCI
14.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Knee Stability and Graft Function after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of a Lateral and an Anatomical Femoral Tunnel Placement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0363546504263947
The paper
Yamamoto, Y., Hsu, W.-H., Woo, S. L.-Y., Van Scyoc, A. H., Takakura, Y., & Debski, R. E. (2004). Knee Stability and Graft Function after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of a Lateral and an Anatomical Femoral Tunnel Placement. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546504263947

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.