Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 476

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: Normative Data

Anderson, Allen F., Irrgang, James J., Kocher, Mininder S., Mann, Barton J., Harrast, John J., Members of the International Knee Documentation Committee·2006·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form may be used to measure symptoms, function, and sports activity for people with a variety of knee disorders, including ligamentous and meniscal injuries, osteoarthritis, and patellofemoral dysfunction. To date, normative data have not been established for this valid, reliable, and responsive outcomes instrument. Purpose: To provide clinicians and researchers with normative data to facilitate the interpretation of results on the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey. Methods: The Subjective Knee Evaluation Form was mailed to 600 people in each of 8 age/gender categories (18-24 years, 25-34 years, 35-50 years, and 51-65 years for both male subjects and female subjects). Participants were drawn from a panel of 550 000 households (1 300 000 subjects) representative of noninstitutionalized persons in the United States and were matched to data from the United States Census Bureau on geographical region, market size, income, and household size. Results: Complete data were available for 5246 knees. Twenty-eight percent of respondents reported an injury, weakness, or other problem with one or both knees. Normative data were determined for respondents as a whole and for the subset of respondents with no history of knee problems. Mean scores were determined for men aged 18 to 24 years (89 ± 18), 25 to 34 years (89 ± 16), 35 to 50 years (85 ± 19), and 51 to 55 years (77 ± 23); mean scores were also determined for women aged 18 to 24 years (86 ± 19), 25 to 34 years (86 ± 19), 35 to 50 years (80 ± 23), and 51 to 65 years (71 ± 26). Scores were higher for the subset of respondents with no history of current or prior knee problems. Conclusion: Scores on the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form vary by age, gender, and history of knee problems. The normative data collected in this article will allow clinicians to interpret how patients with knee injuries are functioning relative to their age-and gender-matched peers and will enable researchers to determine the clinical outcomes of treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546505280214

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 476

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, A. F., Irrgang, J. J., Kocher, M. S., Mann, B. J., Harrast, J. J., & Members of the International Knee Documentation Committee
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2006-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
128-135
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2006965376
Cited by
476
References
22
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: Normative Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0363546505280214
The paper
Anderson, A. F., Irrgang, J. J., Kocher, M. S., Mann, B. J., Harrast, J. J., & Members of the International Knee Documentation Committee. (2006). The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: Normative Data. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505280214

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.