Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 466

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effects of Plyometric versus Dynamic Stabilization and Balance Training on Lower Extremity Biomechanics

Myer, Gregory D., Ford, Kevin R., McLean, Scott G., Hewett, Timothy E.·2006·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: Neuromuscular training that includes both plyometric and dynamic stabilization/balance exercises alters movement biomechanics and reduces ACL injury risk in female athletes. The biomechanical effects of plyometric and balance training utilized separately are unknown. Hypothesis: A protocol that includes balance training without plyometric training will decrease coronal plane hip, knee, and ankle motions during landing, and plyometric training will not affect coronal plane measures. The corollary hypothesis was that plyometric and balance training effects on knee flexion are dependent on the movement task tested. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Eighteen high school female athletes participated in 18 training sessions during a 7-week period. The plyometric group (n= 8) performed maximum-effort jumping and cutting exercises, and the balance group (n = 10) used dynamic stabilization/ balance exercises during training. Lower extremity kinematics were measured during the drop vertical jump and the medial drop landing before and after training using 3D motion analysis techniques. Results: During the drop vertical jump, both plyometric and balance training reduced initial contact (P= .002), maximum hip adduction angle (P= .015), and maximum ankle eversion angle (P= .020). During the medial drop landing, both groups decreased initial contact (P= .002) and maximum knee abduction angle (P= .038). Plyometric training increased initial contact knee flexion (P= .047) and maximum knee flexion (P= .031) during the drop vertical jump, whereas the balance training increased maximum knee flexion (P= .005) during the medial drop landing. Conclusion: Both plyometric and balance training can reduce lower extremity valgus measures. Plyometric training affects sagittal plane kinematics primarily during a drop vertical jump, whereas balance training affects sagittal plane kinematics during single-legged drop landing. Clinical Relevance: Both plyometric and dynamic stabilization/balance exercises should be included in injury-prevention protocols.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546505281241

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 466

Metadata

Authors
Myer, G. D., Ford, K. R., McLean, S. G., & Hewett, T. E.
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2006-03
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
445-455
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2017884022
Cited by
466
References
2
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Plyometric versus Dynamic Stabilization and Balance Training on Lower Extremity Biomechanics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0363546505281241
The paper
Myer, G. D., Ford, K. R., McLean, S. G., & Hewett, T. E. (2006). The Effects of Plyometric versus Dynamic Stabilization and Balance Training on Lower Extremity Biomechanics. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546505281241

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.