Cited by 117Hip disorders and treatmentsPelvic and Acetabular InjuriesOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of Acetabular Labrum Tears on Hip Stability and Labral Strain in a Joint Compression Model

Smith, Matthew V., Panchal, Hemang B., Ruberte Thiele, Ramon A., Sekiya, Jon K.·2011·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background: Acetabular labrum tears are now commonly diagnosed in young and active patients. Because the role of the acetabular labrum is incompletely understood, it is critical to determine how these tears affect native hip biomechanics. Hypothesis: Radial and circumferential labral tears significantly decrease hip stability and significantly alter strain patterns in the anterior and anterior-superior acetabular labrum. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Twenty-two human cadaveric hips without evidence of degeneration or dysplasia were assigned to a circumferential tear (n = 11) and a radial tear (n = 11) group. The hips were tested in a neutral position with an average compressive force of 25 N. In the circumferential tear group, the labral states were intact; 1-, 2-, and 3-cm circumferential tears; a 3-cm partial labrectomy; and a full labrectomy. In the radial tear group, the labral states were intact; a radial tear; a 1-, 2-, and 3-cm partial labrectomy; and a full labrectomy. The effect of labral injury on the stability ratio (peak dislocation force/compressive loads) and labral strain in the anterior and anterior-superior labrum was analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: There was no significant difference in stability ratio after circumferential tears 3 cm or less in size compared with the intact labral state. Strain in the anterior and anterior-superior labrum was either unchanged or increased after circumferential labral tear. There was no significant difference in stability ratio after a radial tear or a 1-cm partial labrectomy compared with the intact labral state. A 2-cm partial labrectomy significantly decreased the stability ratio. Anterior and anterior-superior labral strain significantly decreased after a radial tear. Conclusion: Under the influence of joint compression in a neutral hip position, the acetabular labrum continues to resist femoral head dislocation despite detachment from the acetabular rim. A radial tear in the acetabular labrum decreases adjacent labral strain, but removal of 2 cm or more of the acetabular labrum is needed before hip stability decreases. Clinical Relevance: The findings suggest that the acetabular labrum continues to function to resist femoral head translation despite chondral-labral separation and that labral preservation, particularly with larger tears, may be important for maintaining hip stability. Further studies are needed to determine the effect of partial labral excision on the stability ratio with the hip in provocative positions such as extension, external rotation, and abduction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546511400981

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Alexander JW, 2007, Trans Orthop Res Soc, 32, 71
  2. 10.2106/JBJS.D.02806 · DOI
  3. 10.1302/0301-620X.90B8.20161 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/BLO.0b013e31815b181f · DOI
  5. 10.1302/0301-620X.68B3.3733805 · DOI
  6. 10.2106/JBJS.G.00467 · DOI
  7. Espinosa N, 2006, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 88, 925
  8. 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00365-2 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00042-7 · DOI
  10. 10.3928/0147-7447-19880101-14 · DOI
  11. 10.1097/01.blo.0000096804.78689.c2 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.02.016 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.025.1100230630 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/jor.20852 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.arthro.2005.08.013 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.12.014 · DOI
  17. 10.1097/01.blo.0000073341.50837.91 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80134-1 · DOI
  19. 10.1097/00003086-199306000-00004 · DOI
  20. 10.1097/00003086-200301000-00008 · DOI
  21. 10.1097/00003086-200112000-00004 · DOI
  22. 10.1054/arth.2001.28370 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/s00402-003-0527-7 · DOI
  24. 10.1055/s-2003-41083 · DOI
  25. 10.1097/00003086-197305000-00003 · DOI
  26. Safran MR, 2009, Trans Orthop Res Soc, 34, 1183
  27. 10.1097/00003086-200101000-00031 · DOI
  28. Song Y, 2009, Trans Orthop Res Soc, 34, 1153

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Smith, M. V., Panchal, H. B., Ruberte Thiele, R. A., & Sekiya, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Corresponding author
Sekiya, Jon K.
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2011-07
Volume
39
Issue
1_suppl
Pages
103-110
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2164595971
Cited by
117
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Keywords
hip stability, femoral head dislocation, joint compression, hip biomechanics, stability ratio
MeSH terms
Acetabulum, Adult, Aged, Cadaver, Cartilage, Articular, Female, Hip Joint, Humans, Joint Instability, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Anatomic, Stress, Mechanical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review