Cited by 70Knee injuries and reconstruction techniquesTendon Structure and TreatmentPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Derived Stem Cells Transduced With BMP2 Accelerate Graft-Bone Integration After ACL Reconstruction

Kawakami, Yohei, Takayama, Koji, Matsumoto, Tomoyuki, Tang, Ying, Wang, Bing, Mifune, Yutaka, Cummins, James H., Warth, Ryan J. +4 more·2017·The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Strong graft-bone integration is a prerequisite for successful graft remodeling after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using soft tissue grafts. Novel strategies to accelerate soft tissue graft-bone integration are needed to reduce the need for bone-tendon-bone graft harvest, reduce patient convalescence, facilitate rehabilitation, and reduce total recovery time after ACL reconstruction. HYPOTHESIS: The application of ACL-derived stem cells with enhanced expression of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP2) onto soft tissue grafts in the form of cell sheets will both accelerate and improve the quality of graft-bone integration after ACL reconstruction in a rat model. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: ACL-derived CD34+ cells were isolated from remnant human ACL tissues, virally transduced to express BMP2, and embedded within cell sheets. In a rat model of ACL injury, bilateral single-bundle ACL reconstructions were performed, in which cell sheets were wrapped around tendon autografts before reconstruction. Four groups containing a total of 48 rats (96 knees) were established (n = 12 rats; 24 knees per group): CD34+BMP2 (100%), CD34+BMP2 (25%), CD34+ (untransduced), and a control group containing no cells. Six rats from each group were euthanized 2 and 4 weeks after surgery, and each graft was harvested for immunohistochemical and histological analyses. The remaining 6 rats in each group were euthanized at 4 and 8 weeks to evaluate in situ tensile load to failure in each femur-graft-tibia complex. RESULTS: In vitro, BMP2 transduction promoted the osteogenic differentiation of ACL-derived CD34+ cells while retaining their intrinsic multipotent capabilities. Osteoblast densities were greatest in the BMP2 (100%) and BMP2 (25%) groups. Bone tunnels in the CD34+BMP2 (100%) and CD34+BMP2 (25%) groups had the smallest cross-sectional areas according to micro-computed tomography analyses. Graft-bone integration occurred most rapidly in the CD34+BMP2 (25%) group. Tensile load to failure was significantly greater in the groups containing stem cells at 4 and 8 weeks after surgery. Tensile strength was greatest in the CD34+BMP2 (100%) group at 4 weeks, and in the CD34+BMP2 (25%) group at 8 weeks. CONCLUSION: ACL-derived CD34+ cells transduced with BMP2 accelerated graft-bone integration after ACL reconstruction using soft tissue autografts in a rat model, as evidenced by improved histological appearance and graft-bone interface biology along with tensile load to failure at each time point up to 8 weeks after surgery. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: A primary disadvantage of using soft tissue grafts for ACL reconstruction is the prolonged time required for bony ingrowth, which delays the initiation of midsubstance graft remodeling. The lack of consistent correlation between the appearance of a "healed" ACL on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and readiness to return to sport results in athletes being released to sport before the graft is ready to handle high-intensity loading. Therefore, it is desirable to identify strategies that accelerate graft-bone integration, which would reduce the time to biologic fixation, improve the reliability of biologic fixation, allow for accelerated rehabilitation, and potentially reduce the incidence of early graft pullout and late midsubstance failure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0363546516671707

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawakami, Y., Takayama, K., Matsumoto, T., Tang, Y., Wang, B., Mifune, Y., Cummins, J. H., Warth, R. J., Kuroda, R., Kurosaka, M., Fu, F. H., & Huard, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Steadman Philippon Research Institute (US)
  • Kobe University (JP)
Corresponding author
Huard, Johnny
Venue
The American Journal of Sports Medicine
Published
2016-12-14
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
584-597
ISSN
  • 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3365
OpenAlex
W2557793289
Cited by
70
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, BMP-2, CD34+ cells, cell sheets, tendon autograft, osteogenic differentiation, graft remodeling, bone tunnel, rat model, bone graft alternatives, knee biomechanics
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Animals, Cell Differentiation, Female, Humans, Osteogenesis, Rats, Nude, Reproducibility of Results, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Stem Cell Transplantation, Rats, Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2, Young Adult, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review