The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biomechanical and histological evaluation of muscle after controlled strain injury
Abstract
This study correlates force generation and healing in muscle after controlled strain injury. Right tibialis ante rior (TA) muscles from 30 rabbits were strained to approximately 80% of failure while the left TA muscles served as control. Both injured and control muscles were then tested for ability to generate force. Seven animals were sacrificed immediately after testing and the muscles were examined grossly and histologically. Remaining animals were retested at 24 hours (N = 7), 48 hours (N = 8), and 7 days (N = 8). Contractile ability following injury was 70.5% of control immediately, 51.1% at 24 hours, 74.5% at 48 hours, and 92.5% at 7 days. Immediate histology showed limited distal fiber rupture and hemorrhage. By 24 hours, histology showed fiber necrosis, infiltration of inflammatory cells, edema, and hemorrhage. At 48 hours there was com plete fiber breakdown and intense inflammatory cell proliferation. At 7 days inflammation was reduced and collagen fibrosis more advanced. Our findings demon strate that injured muscle begins functional recovery by 48 hours despite inflammation and active healing. This suggests that decreasing muscle function seen clinically between 24 and 48 hours following strain injury may result from pain due to inflammation. Scarring and fibrosis seen at 7 days may explain the frequent recur rence of injury to strained muscles.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Myofibrillar damage following intense eccentric exercise in man
Fridén, J., Sjöström, M., & Ekblom, B. (1983) · International Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-2008-1026030 · Cited by 1,005
Cited by
TENDON INJURY AND TENDINOPATHY: HEALING AND REPAIR
SHARMA, P., & MAFFULLI, N. (2005) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200501000-00030 · Cited by 1,074
Garrett, W. E. (1996) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/036354659602406s02 · Cited by 607
Self-citationMUSCLE INJURIES AND REPAIR: CURRENT TRENDS IN RESEARCH
HUARD, J., LI, Y., & FU, F. H. (2002) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/00004623-200205000-00022 · Cited by 522
Biomechanical comparison of stimulated and nonstimulated skeletal muscle pulled to failure
Garrett, W. E., Safran, M. R., Seaber, A. V., Glisson, R. R., & Ribbeck, B. M. (1987) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/036354658701500504 · Cited by 298
Self-citationHamstring Muscle Complex: An Imaging Review
Koulouris, G., & Connell, D. (2005) · RadioGraphics · doi:10.1148/rg.253045711 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Nikolaou, P. K., Macdonald, B. L., Glisson, R. R., Seaber, A. V., & Garrett, W. E.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-14
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2031881999
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomechanical and histological evaluation of muscle after controlled strain injury. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/036354658701500102
- The paper
- Nikolaou, P. K., Macdonald, B. L., Glisson, R. R., Seaber, A. V., & Garrett, W. E. (1987). Biomechanical and histological evaluation of muscle after controlled strain injury. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658701500102
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.