The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and allograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the goat model
Abstract
Similar-sized patellar tendon autografts and fresh-fro zen allografts were used to reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament of one knee in 40 female goats. Evaluations of the reconstructions and contralateral controls at the 6-week and 6-month postoperative pe riods included anterior-posterior translation, mechanical properties determined during tensile failure tests, meas urement of cross-sectional area, histology, collagen fibril size and area distribution, and associated articular cartilage degenerative changes. Six months after anterior cruciate ligament recon struction, the autografts demonstrated a smaller in crease in anterior-posterior displacement, values of maximum force to failure two times greater, a significant increase in cross-sectional area, a more rapid loss of large-diameter collagen fibrils, and an increased density and number of small-diameter collagen fibrils compared to the allografts. Clinical significance . More surgeons are allowing their patients to return to running and sports 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. While the structural and material properties of autografts and allografts at time zero are similar, in the goat model during the first 6 months they differ. The allografts demonstrate a greater decrease in their implantation structural properties, a slower rate of biologic incorpo ration, and the prolonged presence of an inflammatory response. At 6 months the autograft demonstrates a more robust biologic response, improved stability, and increased strength to failure values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tissue Engineering of Ligaments
Vunjak-Novakovic, G., Altman, G., Horan, R., & Kaplan, D. L. (2004) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.6.040803.140037 · Cited by 346
Graft remodeling and ligamentization after cruciate ligament reconstruction
Scheffler, S. U., Unterhauser, F. N., & Weiler, A. (2008) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-008-0560-8 · Cited by 266
“Biological failure” of the anterior cruciate ligament graft
Ménétrey, J., Duthon, V. B., Laumonier, T., & Fritschy, D. (2008) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-007-0474-x · Cited by 227
Janssen, R. P. A., & Scheffler, S. U. (2014) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-013-2634-5 · Cited by 225
Papageorgiou, C. D., Ma, C. B., Abramowitch, S. D., Clineff, T. D., & Woo, S. L.-Y. (2001) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/03635465010290051501 · Cited by 190
Metadata
- Authors
- Jackson, D. W., Grood, E. S., Goldstein, J. D., Rosen, M. A., Kurzweil, P. R., Cummings, J. F., & Simon, T. M.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 176-185
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W2100305113
- Cited by
- 501
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and allograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the goat model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/036354659302100203
- The paper
- Jackson, D. W., Grood, E. S., Goldstein, J. D., Rosen, M. A., Kurzweil, P. R., Cummings, J. F., & Simon, T. M. (1993). A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and allograft used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the goat model. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659302100203
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.