The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biomechanical Responses to Repeated Stretches in Human Hamstring Muscle In Vivo
Abstract
To examine stiffness, energy, and passive torque in the dynamic and static phases of a stretch maneuver in the human hamstring muscle in vivo we used a test- retest protocol and a repeated stretches protocol. Re sistance to stretch was defined as passive torque (in newton-meters) offered by the hamstring muscle group during passive knee extension as measured using an isokinetic dynamometer with a modified thigh pad. In 13 uninjured subjects, the knee was passively ex tended to a predetermined final position (0.0875 rad/ sec, dynamic phase) where it remained stationary for 90 seconds (static phase). The test-retest protocol in cluded two tests administered 1 hour apart. On a sep arate occasion, five consecutive static stretches were administered separated by 30 seconds and followed by a sixth stretch 1 hour later. For the test-retest phase, stiffness and energy in the dynamic phase and passive torque in the static phase did not differ and yielded correlations of r = 0.91 to 0.99. During the static phase, passive torque declined in both tests ( P < 0.0001). For the repeated stretches, decreases were observed for energy ( P < 0.01) and stiffness ( P < 0.05) in the dynamic phase and for passive torque ( P < 0.0001) in the static phase. However, the decline in the variables returned to baseline within 1 hour. The data show that the method employed is a useful tool for measuring biomechanical variables during a stretch maneuver. This may provide a more detailed method to examine skeletal muscle flexibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Increasing Muscle Extensibility: A Matter of Increasing Length or Modifying Sensation?
Weppler, C. H., & Magnusson, S. P. (2010) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20090012 · Cited by 435
Self-citationAcute Muscle Stretching Inhibits Maximal Strength Performance
Kokkonen, J., Nelson, A. G., & Cornwell, A. (1998) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.1998.10607716 · Cited by 416
Effect of Acute Static Stretching on Force, Balance, Reaction Time, and Movement Time
BEHM, D. G., BAMBURY, A., CAHILL, F., & POWER, K. (2004) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000135788.23012.5f · Cited by 379
Magnusson, P., & Renström, P. (2006) · European Journal of Sport Science · doi:10.1080/17461390600617865 · Cited by 91
The effects of dynamic stretching on the passive properties of the muscle-tendon unit
Herda, T. J., Herda, N. D., Costa, P. B., Walter-Herda, A. A., Valdez, A. M., & Cramer, J. T. (2013) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/02640414.2012.736632 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Magnusson, S. P., Simonsen, E. B., Aagaard, P., & Kjaer, M.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 622-628
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W1998477000
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biomechanical Responses to Repeated Stretches in Human Hamstring Muscle In Vivo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/036354659602400510
- The paper
- Magnusson, S. P., Simonsen, E. B., Aagaard, P., & Kjaer, M. (1996). Biomechanical Responses to Repeated Stretches in Human Hamstring Muscle In Vivo. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659602400510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.