The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Concept For Isokinetic Hamstring: Quadriceps Muscle Strength Ratio
Abstract
Conventionally, the hamstring:quadriceps strength ratio is calculated by dividing the maximal knee flexor (hamstring) moment by the maximal knee extensor (quadriceps) moment measured at identical angular velocity and contraction mode. The agonist-antagonist strength relationship for knee extension and flexion may, however, be better described by the more functional ratios of eccentric hamstring to concentric quadriceps moments (extension), and concentric hamstring to eccentric quadriceps moments (flexion). We compared functional and conventional isokinetic hamstring: quadriceps strength ratios and examined their relation to knee joint angle and joint angular velocity. Peak and angle-specific (50°, 40°, and 30° of knee flexion) moments were determined during maximal concentric and eccentric muscle contractions (10° to 90° of motion; 30 and 240 deg/sec). Across movement speeds and contraction modes the functional ratios for different moments varied between 0.3 and 1.0 (peak and 50°), 0.4 and 1.1 (40°), and 0.4 and 1.4 (30°). In contrast, conventional hamstring:quadriceps ratios were 0.5 to 0.6 based on peak and 50° moments, 0.6 to 0.7 based on 40° moment, and 0.6 to 0.8 based on 30° moment. The functional hamstring:quadriceps ratio for fast knee extension yielded a 1:1 relationship, which increased with extended knee joint position, indicating a significant capacity of the hamstring muscles to provide dynamic knee joint stability in these conditions. The evaluation of knee joint function by use of isokinetic dynamometry should comprise data on functional and conventional hamstring:quadriceps ratios as well as data on absolute muscle strength.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Isokinetic muscle imbalance and knee-joint injuries. A prospective blind study.
Grace, T. G., Sweetser, E. R., Nelson, M. A., Ydens, L. R., & Skipper, B. J. (1984) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-198466050-00012 · Cited by 176 · cited 2×
“No studies so far have been able to demonstrate any clear relationship between imbalance in thigh muscle strength (deducted from conventional H:Q ratio) and an increased incidence of knee injury.(8) However, alternative isokinetic muscle strength variables may prove important when evaluating the prospect for injury pr…”
BackgroundSpecificity of training velocity and training load on gains in isokinetic knee joint strength
AAGAARD, P., SIMONSEN, E. B., TROLLE, M., BANGSBO, J., & KLAUSEN, K. (1996) · Acta Physiologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1046/j.1365-201x.1996.438162000.x · Cited by 140
Self-citation
Cited by
Rahnama, N., Lees, A., & Bambaecichi, E. (2005) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130500101585 · Cited by 295
Greig, M. (2008) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546508314413 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- Aagaard, P., Simonsen, E. B., Magnusson, S. P., Larsson, B., & Dyhre-Poulsen, P.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1998-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 231-237
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W1889916832
- Cited by
- 509
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A New Concept For Isokinetic Hamstring: Quadriceps Muscle Strength Ratio. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/03635465980260021201
- The paper
- Aagaard, P., Simonsen, E. B., Magnusson, S. P., Larsson, B., & Dyhre-Poulsen, P. (1998). A New Concept For Isokinetic Hamstring: Quadriceps Muscle Strength Ratio. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465980260021201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.